INRA (French National Institute for Agricultural Research), Agrocampus Ouest, Université de Rennes1, UMR (Mixed Research Unit) 1099 Biology of Organisms and Populations applied to Plant Protection, Rennes, France.
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023331. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
While the mechanisms underlying quantitative resistance of plants to pathogens are still not fully elucidated, the Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs)-triggered response model suggests that such resistance depends on a dynamic interplay between the plant and the pathogen. In this model, the pathogens themselves or elicitors they produce would induce general defense pathways, which in turn limit pathogen growth and host colonisation. It therefore suggests that quantitative resistance is directly linked to a common set of general host defense mechanisms, but experimental evidence is still inconclusive. We tested the PAMP-triggered model using two pathogens (Pectobacterium atrosepticum and Phytophthora infestans) differing by their infectious processes and five potato cultivars spanning a range of resistance levels to each pathogen. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activity, used as a defense marker, and accumulation of phenolics were measured in tuber slices challenged with lipopolysaccharides from P. atrosepticum or a concentrated culture filtrate from P. infestans. PAL activity increased following treatment with the filtrate but not with lipopolysaccharides, and varied among cultivars. It was positively related to tuber resistance to P. atrosepticum, but negatively related to tuber resistance to P. infestans. It was also positively related to the accumulation of total phenolics. Chlorogenic acid, the main phenolic accumulated, inhibited growth of both pathogens in vitro, showing that PAL induction caused active defense against each of them. Tuber slices in which PAL activity had been induced before inoculation showed increased resistance to P. atrosepticum, but not to P. infestans. Our results show that inducing a general defense mechanism does not necessarily result in quantitative resistance. As such, they invalidate the hypothesis that the PAMP-triggered model alone can explain quantitative resistance. We thus designed a more complex model integrating physiological host response and a key pathogen life history trait, pathogen growth, to explain the differences between the two pathosystems.
虽然植物对病原体的定量抗性的机制尚未完全阐明,但病原体相关分子模式(PAMPs)触发的反应模型表明,这种抗性取决于植物和病原体之间的动态相互作用。在该模型中,病原体本身或它们产生的激发子会诱导一般防御途径,从而限制病原体的生长和宿主定殖。因此,定量抗性直接与一组常见的一般宿主防御机制相关,但实验证据仍不确定。我们使用两种病原体(果胶杆菌和疫霉)和五个马铃薯品种来检验 PAMP 触发模型,这些品种对每种病原体的抗性水平不同。用果胶杆菌的脂多糖或疫霉浓缩培养液滤液处理块茎切片,测量苯丙氨酸解氨酶(PAL)活性作为防御标记物和酚类物质的积累。用滤液处理后 PAL 活性增加,但用脂多糖处理则不增加,而且品种之间也有差异。它与块茎对果胶杆菌的抗性呈正相关,但与块茎对疫霉的抗性呈负相关。它还与总酚类物质的积累呈正相关。在体外,积累的主要酚类物质绿原酸抑制了两种病原体的生长,表明 PAL 诱导导致了对它们的主动防御。在接种前诱导 PAL 活性的块茎切片对果胶杆菌的抗性增加,但对疫霉的抗性没有增加。我们的结果表明,诱导一般防御机制不一定导致定量抗性。因此,它们否定了 PAMP 触发模型单独可以解释定量抗性的假设。因此,我们设计了一个更复杂的模型,该模型整合了生理宿主反应和关键病原体生活史特征,即病原体生长,以解释两个病理系统之间的差异。