Phytopathology. 2000 Aug;90(8):834-42. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.8.834.
ABSTRACT Various aspects of the integration of genotype resistance and chemical control of Ascochyta blight (caused by Didymella rabiei) in chickpea were examined in field experiments from 1993 to 1999 and in greenhouse experiments. Four commercially available chickpea cultivars representing a range of resistance to D. rabiei were used. The efficacy of chemical control in a highly susceptible cultivar was significantly (P < 0.01) related to the conduciveness of the environment to the pathogen. Adequate disease suppression (>80% control) was achieved when weather supported mild epidemics, but insufficient control (<20%) was achieved when weather supported severe epidemics. The contribution of genotype resistance to disease suppression in a moderately susceptible cultivar varied from <10% when weather supported severe epidemics to approximately 60% when weather supported mild epidemics. Spraying a moderately resistant cultivar resulted in 95% control when weather supported mild epidemics, but only 65% control was achieved when weather supported severe epidemics. The existing level of resistance in a moderately resistant cultivar resulted in 70% control when weather supported severe epidemics; fungicides improved control efficacy significantly to >95%. Under mild epidemics, moderate resistance alone provided >95% control. The level of genotype resistance available in a highly resistant cultivar was sufficient to suppress the disease under all weather conditions, even without application of fungicides. The possibility of relying on postinfection rather than prophylactic application of fungicides was tested in the greenhouse and in four field experiments. Activity of the systemic fungicide tebuconazole was detected when the fungicide was applied up to 3 days postinfection, and application of tebuconazole or difenoconazole in the field as a postinfection treatment (i.e., after rain or overhead irrigation) suppressed the disease as effectively as preventive applications and required fewer sprays. In two experiments, the interaction between genotype resistance and chemical control at various amounts of irrigation applied via overhead sprinklers (as a simulation of rain) was tested. The results show that both the level of genotype resistance and the quantity of water should be taken into account in deciding whether to apply a postinfection spray.
摘要 本研究于 1993 年至 1999 年在田间试验和温室试验中对小豆壳球腔菌(由黎豆壳球腔菌引起)的基因型抗性与化学防治相结合的各个方面进行了研究。使用了 4 种具有不同小豆壳球腔菌抗性的商业品种。在高度易感品种中,化学防治的效果(P < 0.01)与环境对病原菌的适宜性显著相关。当天气有利于轻度流行时,可充分抑制病害(> 80%的防治效果),但当天气有利于严重流行时,防治效果不足(< 20%)。在中度易感品种中,基因型抗性对病害抑制的贡献在天气有利于严重流行时小于 10%,在天气有利于轻度流行时约为 60%。当天气有利于轻度流行时,中度抗性品种的喷雾处理可实现 95%的防治效果,但当天气有利于严重流行时,仅能实现 65%的防治效果。中度抗性品种现有的抗性水平在天气有利于严重流行时可实现 70%的防治效果;杀菌剂可显著提高防治效果,达到>95%。在轻度流行时,仅中度抗性就可提供>95%的防治效果。高抗品种中现有的抗性水平足以在所有天气条件下抑制病害,即使不使用杀菌剂也是如此。在温室和 4 个田间试验中测试了依赖于侵染后而不是预防性使用杀菌剂的可能性。在侵染后 3 天内施用系统性杀菌剂戊唑醇时,可检测到其活性,田间施用戊唑醇或咯菌腈作为侵染后处理(即在降雨或喷灌后),与预防性施药一样有效地抑制了病害,且所需喷雾次数更少。在两项试验中,通过顶部喷淋(模拟降雨)施加不同水量的灌溉,测试了基因型抗性与化学防治之间的相互作用。结果表明,在决定是否进行侵染后喷雾时,应考虑到基因型抗性水平和水量。