Phytopathology. 1999 Aug;89(8):668-72. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.8.668.
ABSTRACT Four linear regression methods and a generalized regression neural network (GRNN) were evaluated for estimation of moisture occurrence and duration at the flag leaf level of wheat. Moisture on a flat-plate resistance sensor was predicted by time, temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, solar radiation, and precipitation provided by an automated weather station. Dew onset was estimated by a classification regression tree model. The models were developed using micrometeorological data measured from 1993 to 1995 and tested on data from 1996 and 1997. The GRNN outperformed the linear regression methods in predicting moisture occurrence with and without dew estimation as well as in predicting duration of moisture periods. Average absolute error for prediction of moisture occurrence by GRNN was at least 31% smaller than that obtained by the linear regression methods. Moreover, the GRNN correctly predicted 92.7% of the moisture duration periods critical to disease development in the test data, while the best linear method correctly predicted only 86.6% for the same data. Temporal error distribution in prediction of moisture periods was more highly concentrated around the correct value for the GRNN than linear regression methods. Neural network technology is a promising tool for reasonably precise and accurate moisture monitoring in plant disease management.
摘要 本文评估了 4 种线性回归方法和广义回归神经网络(GRNN),以估计小麦旗叶水平的水分出现和持续时间。通过自动气象站提供的时间、温度、相对湿度、风速、太阳辐射和降水来预测平板电阻传感器上的水分。露水开始时间由分类回归树模型估算。模型使用 1993 年至 1995 年测量的微气象数据开发,并在 1996 年和 1997 年的数据上进行了测试。在预测有或没有露水估计的水分出现以及预测水分持续时间方面,GRNN 优于线性回归方法。GRNN 预测水分出现的平均绝对误差至少比线性回归方法小 31%。此外,GRNN 正确预测了测试数据中对疾病发展至关重要的 92.7%的水分持续时间,而最佳线性方法仅正确预测了相同数据的 86.6%。GRNN 预测水分期的时间误差分布比线性回归方法更集中在正确值附近。神经网络技术是植物病害管理中进行合理精确和准确水分监测的有前途的工具。