Suppr超能文献

区分双眼融合与假性融合。

Discriminating binocular fusion from false fusion.

作者信息

Blake R, Yang Y, Westendorf D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991 Sep;32(10):2821-5.

PMID:1894479
Abstract

In a series of psychophysical experiments, observers discriminated between briefly flashed stimuli (cosine gratings, cosine plaids) that were either identical to the two eyes (dioptic) or differed between the two eyes (dichoptic). Although dioptic and dichoptic binocular stimuli were perceptually similar, they were distinguishable well above chance at exposure durations too brief for the onset of binocular rivalry. Random variations in display contrast did not alter this pattern of results. These results show that the neural events that signal false fusion of dissimilar monocular stimuli are not equivalent to those that underlie binocular fusion of matched monocular views.

摘要

在一系列心理物理学实验中,观察者对短暂闪现的刺激(余弦光栅、余弦方格)进行辨别,这些刺激要么双眼相同(双眼视像),要么双眼不同(双眼分视)。尽管双眼视像和双眼分视的双目刺激在感知上相似,但在暴露持续时间短至不足以引发双眼竞争的情况下,它们仍能显著高于随机水平被区分开来。显示对比度的随机变化并未改变这种结果模式。这些结果表明,表明不同单眼刺激错误融合的神经事件与构成匹配单眼视图双眼融合基础的神经事件并不相同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验