Lee Sang-Hun, Blake Randolph
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, 111 21st Avenue S, Nashville, TN 37215, USA.
Vision Res. 2004 May;44(10):983-91. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.007.
During binocular rivalry, observers sometimes perceive one complete visual object even though component features of that perceptually dominant object are distributed between the two eyes and are in rivalry against other, dissimilar features. This interocular grouping cannot be explained by models of rivalry in which one eye or the other is completely dominant at any given moment. But perhaps global interocular grouping is achieved by simultaneous local eye dominance, wherein portions of one eye's view and complementary portions of the other eye's view become dominant simultaneously. To test this possibility, we performed two experiments using relatively large, complex figures as rival targets. In one experiment we used an "eye-swap" technique to confirm that within given, local spatial regions of rivalry it was the region of an eye--not a given stimulus feature--that was usually dominant. In a second experiment, we measured dominance durations for multiple, local zones of rivalry and then created 1-min animations of a global "montage" in which dominance within local regions was governed by the distributions of dominance measured empirically. These animations included significant periods of time during which global interocular grouping was evident; observers viewed these animations intermixed with actual rivalry displays, and the resulting tracking data confirmed the similarity in global dominance of the two display types. Thus interocular grouping during rivalry does not rule out local, eye-based rivalry, although synergistic and top-down influences almost certainly provide additional force in the promotion of interocular grouping.
在双眼竞争期间,观察者有时会感知到一个完整的视觉对象,即使该感知上占主导地位的对象的组成特征分布在两只眼睛之间,并与其他不同的特征相互竞争。这种双眼间的分组无法用竞争模型来解释,在这些模型中,在任何给定时刻,一只眼睛或另一只眼睛是完全占主导地位的。但也许全局双眼间分组是通过同时的局部眼优势实现的,其中一只眼睛视野的部分和另一只眼睛视野的互补部分同时占主导地位。为了测试这种可能性,我们使用相对较大、复杂的图形作为竞争目标进行了两项实验。在一项实验中,我们使用了“眼交换”技术来确认,在给定的局部竞争空间区域内,通常占主导地位的是一只眼睛的区域——而不是给定的刺激特征。在第二项实验中,我们测量了多个局部竞争区域的优势持续时间,然后创建了一个1分钟的全局“蒙太奇”动画,其中局部区域内的优势由根据经验测量的优势分布来控制。这些动画包括明显的全局双眼间分组的时间段;观察者观看这些动画与实际的竞争显示混合在一起,由此产生的跟踪数据证实了两种显示类型在全局优势方面的相似性。因此,竞争期间的双眼间分组并不排除局部的、基于眼睛的竞争,尽管协同和自上而下的影响几乎肯定在促进双眼间分组方面提供了额外的力量。