Phytopathology. 1998 Jul;88(7):715-23. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.7.715.
ABSTRACT The assessment of citrus tristeza virus incidence by sampling involves laboratory testing by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of leaf material collected in the field. Using field data and computer simulation, methods of field data collection were compared. One method was similar to that used by the Central California Tristeza Eradication Agency, in which 4 to 6% of the trees in a planting block are sampled and material from each tree sampled is assayed separately. This method was compared with an alternative method in which about 25% of the trees in a block are sampled, and material from groups of four trees is bulked and assayed together. Our comparative study indicated that the latter method results in increased accuracy and precision of estimates of citrus tristeza virus incidence without increasing unduly the number of laboratory assays required.
摘要 通过抽样评估柑橘衰退病毒的发病率涉及到对田间采集的叶片材料进行酶联免疫吸附测定的实验室检测。利用田间数据和计算机模拟,对田间数据收集方法进行了比较。一种方法类似于中加州衰退病毒根除机构使用的方法,即从种植块中的 4%至 6%的树木中进行采样,并且对每个采样树木的材料分别进行检测。该方法与另一种方法进行了比较,该方法从一个块中采样约 25%的树木,将四棵树的材料混合在一起进行批量检测。我们的比较研究表明,后一种方法可以在不增加实验室检测数量的情况下,提高柑橘衰退病毒发病率估计的准确性和精密度。