• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝移植后生存结果(SOFT)评分:一种预测肝移植患者生存的新方法。

Survival outcomes following liver transplantation (SOFT) score: a novel method to predict patient survival following liver transplantation.

作者信息

Rana A, Hardy M A, Halazun K J, Woodland D C, Ratner L E, Samstein B, Guarrera J V, Brown R S, Emond J C

机构信息

Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2008 Dec;8(12):2537-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02400.x. Epub 2008 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02400.x
PMID:18945283
Abstract

It is critical to balance waitlist mortality against posttransplant mortality. Our objective was to devise a scoring system that predicts recipient survival at 3 months following liver transplantation to complement MELD-predicted waitlist mortality. Univariate and multivariate analysis on 21,673 liver transplant recipients identified independent recipient and donor risk factors for posttransplant mortality. A retrospective analysis conducted on 30,321 waitlisted candidates reevaluated the predictive ability of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. We identified 13 recipient factors, 4 donor factors and 2 operative factors (warm and cold ischemia) as significant predictors of recipient mortality following liver transplantation at 3 months. The Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplant (SOFT) Score utilized 18 risk factors (excluding warm ischemia) to successfully predict 3-month recipient survival following liver transplantation. This analysis represents a study of waitlisted candidates and transplant recipients of liver allografts after the MELD score was implemented. Unlike MELD, the SOFT score can accurately predict 3-month survival following liver transplantation. The most significant risk factors were previous transplantation and life support pretransplant. The SOFT score can help clinicians determine in real time which candidates should be transplanted with which allografts. Combined with MELD, SOFT can better quantify survival benefit for individual transplant procedures.

摘要

平衡等待名单上的死亡率和移植后的死亡率至关重要。我们的目标是设计一种评分系统,以预测肝移植后3个月时受者的生存情况,从而补充终末期肝病模型(MELD)预测的等待名单死亡率。对21673例肝移植受者进行的单因素和多因素分析确定了移植后死亡率的独立受者和供者风险因素。对30321例等待名单上的候选者进行的回顾性分析重新评估了终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分的预测能力。我们确定了13个受者因素、4个供者因素和2个手术因素(热缺血和冷缺血),作为肝移植后3个月时受者死亡率的重要预测因素。肝移植后生存结果(SOFT)评分利用18个风险因素(不包括热缺血)成功预测了肝移植后3个月时受者的生存情况。该分析是在实施MELD评分后对等待名单上的候选者和肝同种异体移植受者进行的一项研究。与MELD不同,SOFT评分可以准确预测肝移植后3个月的生存情况。最显著的风险因素是既往移植和移植前的生命支持。SOFT评分可以帮助临床医生实时确定哪些候选者应该接受哪种同种异体移植。与MELD相结合,SOFT可以更好地量化个体移植手术的生存获益。

相似文献

1
Survival outcomes following liver transplantation (SOFT) score: a novel method to predict patient survival following liver transplantation.肝移植后生存结果(SOFT)评分:一种预测肝移植患者生存的新方法。
Am J Transplant. 2008 Dec;8(12):2537-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02400.x. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
2
Survival Outcomes Following Pediatric Liver Transplantation (Pedi-SOFT) Score: A Novel Predictive Index.小儿肝移植术后生存结局(Pedi-SOFT)评分:一种新的预测指标。
Am J Transplant. 2015 Jul;15(7):1855-63. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13190. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
3
Survival outcomes in liver transplant recipients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores of 40 or higher: a decade-long experience.终末期肝病模型评分40分及以上的肝移植受者的生存结局:十年经验
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Dec;17(12):1074-84. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12485. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
4
Survival outcomes of right-lobe living donor liver transplantation for patients with high Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores.终末期肝病模型评分高的患者右半肝活体肝移植的生存结果。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013 Jun;12(3):256-62. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(13)60042-9.
5
Predictors of Waitlist Mortality in Portopulmonary Hypertension.门静脉高压性肺动脉高压患者等待名单上死亡的预测因素
Transplantation. 2017 Jul;101(7):1609-1615. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001666.
6
Consequences of the implementation of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease system for liver allocation in Brazil.巴西实施终末期肝病模型系统进行肝脏分配的后果。
Transplant Proc. 2013 Jul-Aug;45(6):2111-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.11.007. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
7
Including body composition in MELD scores improves mortality prediction among patients awaiting liver transplantation.将人体成分纳入 MELD 评分可提高肝移植等待患者的死亡率预测。
Clin Nutr. 2020 Jun;39(6):1885-1892. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
8
Pretransplant model to predict posttransplant survival in liver transplant patients.预测肝移植患者移植后生存率的移植前模型。
Ann Surg. 2002 Sep;236(3):315-22; discussion 322-3. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200209000-00008.
9
Predicting outcome after liver transplantation: utility of the model for end-stage liver disease and a newly derived discrimination function.预测肝移植后的结局:终末期肝病模型及新推导的判别函数的效用。
Transplantation. 2004 Jan 15;77(1):99-106. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000101009.91516.FC.
10
High model for end-stage liver disease score as a predictor of survival during long-term follow-up after liver transplantation.终末期肝病模型评分作为肝移植术后长期随访生存的预测指标。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Mar;44(2):384-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.11.013.

引用本文的文献

1
The evaluation of inflammatory and immune composite markers for complications after deceased donor liver transplantation - a retrospective cohort study.deceased供体肝移植术后并发症的炎症和免疫复合标志物评估——一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2536757. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2536757. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
2
Applications of neural networks in liver transplantation.神经网络在肝移植中的应用。
ILIVER. 2022 Aug 9;1(2):101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.iliver.2022.07.002. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Can elastography predict early allograft dysfunction or loss after liver transplantation? A prospective study of diagnostic accuracy.
弹性成像能否预测肝移植术后早期移植物功能障碍或丧失?一项诊断准确性的前瞻性研究。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 May 1;80:100634. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100634. eCollection 2025.
4
Smart transplants: emerging role of nanotechnology and big data in kidney and islet transplantation, a frontier in precision medicine.智能移植:纳米技术和大数据在肾脏及胰岛移植中的新兴作用,精准医学的前沿领域。
Front Immunol. 2025 Apr 8;16:1567685. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1567685. eCollection 2025.
5
Prolonged allograft survival in liver transplantation.肝移植中同种异体移植物的长期存活
Surg Open Sci. 2025 Mar 28;25:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.03.006. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Elderly Ages in Liver Transplantation: Are Older Donors Really Higher Risk?肝移植中的老年受者:老年供者风险真的更高吗?
Transplant Direct. 2025 Apr 9;11(5):e1789. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001789. eCollection 2025 May.
7
Protocol for an international multicenter, prospective, observational, non-competitive, study to validate and optimise prediction models of 90-day and 1-year allograft failure after liver transplantation: The global IMPROVEMENT Study.一项国际多中心、前瞻性、观察性、非竞争性研究的方案,旨在验证和优化肝移植后90天和1年同种异体移植物失败的预测模型:全球IMPROVEMENT研究。
Updates Surg. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02078-4.
8
Perspectives and Tools in Liver Graft Assessment: A Transformative Era in Liver Transplantation.肝脏移植评估的视角与工具:肝脏移植的变革时代
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 17;13(2):494. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020494.
9
Predicting futile outcomes following deceased donor liver transplantation in non-HCC patients with MELD-Na score above 30: a retrospective international multicenter cohort study.预测终末期肝病模型钠评分(MELD-Na)高于30分的非肝癌患者在接受脑死亡供体肝移植后的无效结局:一项回顾性国际多中心队列研究
Int J Surg. 2025 May 1;111(5):3148-3158. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002280.
10
Classification-augmented survival estimation (CASE): A novel method for individualized long-term survival prediction with application to liver transplantation.分类增强生存估计(CASE):一种用于个体化长期生存预测的新方法及其在肝移植中的应用
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 17;20(1):e0315928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315928. eCollection 2025.