Savitz Sean I, Levitan Emily B, Wears Robert, Edlow Jonathan A
Department of Neurology, University of Texas Houston Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
J Neurol Sci. 2009 Jan 15;276(1-2):123-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.09.019. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
Severe, abrupt onset headache raises concern for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The current standard work-up is brain CT scan followed by LP if the CT is non-diagnostic in patients with a normal neurological exam. Some have suggested that angiography is also indicated in this common clinical situation. Is evaluation with brain CT and LP for thunderclap headache to rule out SAH sufficient and is angiography needed?
We systematically searched for studies that followed neurologically-intact patients with thunderclap headache and normal CT and LP for at least 1 year. The primary outcome was SAH. We estimated the proportion of patients who developed SAH and the one-sided upper 95% confidence bound.
Seven studies including 813 patients were identified. None of the patients developed SAH during follow-up (pooled proportion=0, upper 95% confidence bound=0.004).
Although our methods have important limitations, we believe that this analysis will give clinicians better tools to decide whether or not to pursue further work-up with angiography in patients with thunderclap headache and normal neurological exam, CT, and LP.
严重的突发性头痛会引发对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)的担忧。目前的标准检查方法是先进行脑部CT扫描,如果CT对神经系统检查正常的患者无诊断价值,则随后进行腰椎穿刺(LP)。一些人认为在这种常见的临床情况下也应进行血管造影。对于霹雳样头痛,通过脑部CT和LP来排除SAH是否足够,是否需要血管造影?
我们系统地检索了对神经系统完好的霹雳样头痛且CT和LP正常的患者进行至少1年随访的研究。主要结局是SAH。我们估计了发生SAH的患者比例以及单侧95%置信上限。
确定了7项研究,共813例患者。在随访期间,没有患者发生SAH(合并比例=0,95%置信上限=0.004)。
尽管我们的方法有重要局限性,但我们认为该分析将为临床医生提供更好的工具,以决定对霹雳样头痛且神经系统检查、CT和LP正常的患者是否进行血管造影的进一步检查。