Brillantino Antonio, Monaco Luigi, Schettino Michele, Torelli Francesco, Izzo Giuseppe, Cosenza Angelo, Marano Luigi, Di Martino Natale
VIII Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Dec;20(12):1136-43. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32830aba6d.
The role of duodenogastric reflux in gastrooesophageal reflux disease is still controversial.
(i) To determine the prevalence of pathological duodenogastric reflux (DGR) in gastrooesophageal reflux disease patients and (ii) to define the relationship between DGR and duodenogastrooesophageal reflux.
We evaluated 92 patients referred for investigation of recurrent reflux symptoms after proton pump inhibitors (PPI) therapy. All the patients filled out symptom questionnaires and underwent endoscopy, oesophageal manometry and combined oesophagogastric pH and bilirubin monitoring.
Endoscopy divided the 92 patients into four groups (group I: 25 nonoesophagitis patients, group II: 26 patients with grade A-B oesophagitis, group III: 21 patients with grade C-D oesophagitis and group IV: 20 patients with Barrett's oesophagus. Twenty-four of the 92 patients (26%) showed pathological DGR. Abnormal oesophageal bilirubin exposure was observed in 62 of the 92 patients (67.4%). Of the 62 patients with abnormal oesophageal bilimetry, 15 (24.2%) patients simultaneously showed pathological DGR. The gastric bilirubin exposure in patients with abnormal oesophageal, Bilitec tests did not differ from that in patients with normal oesophageal bilimetry (P>0.05). A weak correlation between oesophageal and gastric bilirubin exposure, both expressed as a percentage of time, was found (r=0.28; P<0.01).
Pathological DGR is present in a little more than a quarter of patients with recurrent reflux and dyspeptic symptoms after PPI therapy. Excessive DGR is not a prerequisite for pathological oesophageal exposure to duodenal contents. Gastric bilirubin monitoring may be useful to choose the best surgical treatment for patients with reflux and dyspeptic symptoms refractory to PPI.
十二指肠-胃反流在胃食管反流病中的作用仍存在争议。
(i)确定胃食管反流病患者中病理性十二指肠-胃反流(DGR)的患病率,以及(ii)明确DGR与十二指肠-胃-食管反流之间的关系。
我们评估了92例在质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗后因反复出现反流症状而前来检查的患者。所有患者均填写症状问卷,并接受内镜检查、食管测压以及食管-胃pH值和胆红素联合监测。
内镜检查将92例患者分为四组(I组:25例无食管炎患者,II组:26例A - B级食管炎患者,III组:21例C - D级食管炎患者,IV组:20例巴雷特食管患者)。92例患者中有24例(26%)显示病理性DGR。92例患者中有62例(67.4%)观察到食管胆红素暴露异常。在62例食管胆红素测定异常的患者中,15例(24.2%)同时显示病理性DGR。食管Bilitec检测异常的患者与食管胆红素测定正常的患者的胃胆红素暴露情况无差异(P>0.05)。发现食管和胃胆红素暴露之间存在弱相关性,两者均以时间百分比表示(r = 0.28;P<0.01)。
在PPI治疗后出现反复反流和消化不良症状的患者中,略多于四分之一的患者存在病理性DGR。过多的DGR并非食管病理性暴露于十二指肠内容物的先决条件。胃胆红素监测可能有助于为对PPI治疗无效的反流和消化不良症状患者选择最佳手术治疗方案。