Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China.
Osteoporos Int. 2009 Jun;20(6):979-87. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0773-1. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
Exercise may be a viable way to promote bone health in stroke survivors. This study used the osteogenic index to evaluate the osteogenic potential of selected exercises for stroke survivors. The results show that brisk walking and stepping may be good skeletal loading exercises for this population.
Exercise may induce positive effects on bone health in stroke patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the osteogenic potential of selected exercises for stroke survivors.
Sixty stroke patients were categorized into group 1 (moderate to severe leg motor impairment) and group 2 (mild to moderate impairment). Each subject performed five exercises in random order: walking at self-selected speed, walking at maximal speed, stepping onto a 6-in. riser, sit-to-stand, and jumping. The peak ground reaction force (GRF) on the hemiparetic side and the number of loading cycles achieved in 1 min were determined. The osteogenic index (OI) was computed for each exercise, based on the formula: OI = Peak GRF (in body weight) x In (number of loading cycles + 1). Two-way analysis of variance was used to compare the OI among the five exercises between the two groups.
For group 1, stepping had significantly higher OI than other exercises (p < 0.001). For group 2, both walking at maximal speed and stepping had significantly higher OI than other exercises (p < 0.001).
Stepping had the highest OI for those with more severe leg motor impairment. Both stepping and brisk walking had superior OI for those with mild leg motor impairment.
运动可能是促进中风幸存者骨骼健康的可行方法。本研究使用成骨指数来评估选定的运动对中风幸存者的成骨潜力。结果表明,快步走和踏步可能是适合该人群的骨骼负荷运动。
运动可能对中风患者的骨骼健康产生积极影响。本研究的目的是评估选定的运动对中风幸存者的成骨潜力。
将 60 名中风患者分为 1 组(下肢运动严重受损)和 2 组(下肢运动轻度至中度受损)。每个患者以随机顺序进行 5 种运动:以自选速度行走、以最大速度行走、踏在 6 英寸高的平台上、从座位站起来和跳跃。测量偏瘫侧的峰值地面反作用力(GRF)和 1 分钟内完成的负荷循环次数。根据公式:OI = 峰值 GRF(体重)x In(负荷循环次数+1),计算每种运动的成骨指数(OI)。使用双因素方差分析比较两组 5 种运动之间的 OI。
对于 1 组,踏步的 OI 明显高于其他运动(p<0.001)。对于 2 组,最大速度行走和踏步的 OI 明显高于其他运动(p<0.001)。
对于下肢运动严重受损的患者,踏步的 OI 最高。对于下肢运动轻度受损的患者,踏步和快步走的 OI 都较高。