Suppr超能文献

住院期间的不良事件:患者调查结果

Adverse events during hospitalization: results of a patient survey.

作者信息

Fowler Floyd J, Epstein Arnold, Weingart Saul N, Annas Catherine L, Bolcic-Jankovic Dragana, Clarridge Brian, Schneider Eric C, Weissman Joel S

机构信息

Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Oct;34(10):583-90. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34073-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A two-stage probability sample of patients recently discharged from 16 general acute care hospitals in Massachusetts were interviewed to determine the rates at which patients experience what they considered to be adverse events, to describe the kinds of events they reported, and to identify the correlates of those reports.

METHODS

Eligible respondents were adults, 18 years of age or older, who were medical or surgical patients overnight or longer between April 1 and October 1, 2003, and who were discharged to their homes in Massachusetts. Questions covered perceptions of adverse events during hospitalizations and possible correlates of those events. Telephone interviews were carried out an average of nine months after discharge with 2,582 patients (response rate, 53%-60%).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine percent of respondents reported at least one unexpected "negative" event during their hospitalization. After physician review, the revised estimate was that 25% perceived that they had experienced at least one event that met our definition for an adverse event. The most common reported events were reactions to newly prescribed drugs (40%) and the effects of surgery (34%). Physician reviewers coded 57% of the adverse events as "significant" and 18% as "serious" or "life-threatening." The physician reviewers also rated 31% of the reported adverse events as likely to be preventable.

DISCUSSION

The estimate that one in four hospital patients experienced an adverse event is considerably higher than the published rates based on hospital record review, indicating the potential value of surveys for studies of patient safety. Because of nonresponse among older patients, that estimate is probably an underestimate. Designs that would reduce lags between discharge and interviews and decrease hospital nonresponses would reduce two key threats to confidence in the survey results.

摘要

背景

对马萨诸塞州16家综合急性护理医院近期出院的患者进行两阶段概率抽样访谈,以确定患者经历他们认为的不良事件的发生率,描述他们报告的事件类型,并确定这些报告的相关因素。

方法

符合条件的受访者为18岁及以上的成年人,他们在2003年4月1日至10月1日期间作为内科或外科患者住院过夜或更长时间,并在马萨诸塞州出院回家。问题涵盖住院期间对不良事件的认知以及这些事件的可能相关因素。出院后平均九个月对2582名患者进行电话访谈(回复率为53%-60%)。

结果

29%的受访者报告在住院期间至少发生了一次意外的“负面”事件。经医生审核后,修订后的估计是,25%的受访者认为他们经历了至少一次符合我们对不良事件定义的事件。报告最多的事件是对新开药物的反应(40%)和手术的影响(34%)。医生审核人员将57%的不良事件归类为“重大”,18%归类为“严重”或“危及生命”。医生审核人员还将31%的报告不良事件评定为可能可预防。

讨论

估计四分之一的住院患者经历了不良事件,这一比例远高于基于医院记录审查公布的发生率,表明调查对于患者安全研究的潜在价值。由于老年患者未回复,该估计可能偏低。减少出院与访谈之间的时间间隔以及降低医院无回复率的设计将减少对调查结果可信度的两个关键威胁。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验