• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疗养院中药物不良事件的发生率及可预防性。

Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in nursing homes.

作者信息

Gurwitz J H, Field T S, Avorn J, McCormick D, Jain S, Eckler M, Benser M, Edmondson A C, Bates D W

机构信息

Meyers Primary Care Institute, the Fallon Healthcare System, and the University of Massachusetts Medical School (JHG, TSF, DM, SJ, ME, MB), Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2000 Aug 1;109(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00451-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00451-4
PMID:10967148
Abstract

PURPOSE

Adverse drug events, especially those that may have been preventable, are among the most serious concerns about medication use in nursing homes. We studied the incidence and preventability of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events in nursing homes.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study of all long-term care residents of 18 community-based nursing homes in Massachusetts during a 12-month observation period. Potential drug-related incidents were detected by stimulated self-report by nursing home staff and by periodic review of the records of nursing home residents by trained nurse and pharmacist investigators. Each incident was classified by 2 independent physician-reviewers, using a structured implicit review process, by whether or not it constituted an adverse drug event or potential adverse drug event (those that may have caused harm, but did not because of chance or because they were detected), by the severity of the event (significant, serious, life-threatening, or fatal), and by whether it was preventable. Examples of significant events included nonurticarial rashes, falls without associated fracture, hemorrhage not requiring transfusion or hospitalization, and oversedation; examples of serious events included urticaria, falls with fracture, hemorrhage requiring transfusion or hospitalization, and delirium.

RESULTS

During 28,839 nursing home resident-months of observation in the 18 participating nursing homes, 546 adverse drug events (1.89 per 100 resident-months) and 188 potential adverse drug events (0.65 per 100 resident-months) were identified. Of the adverse drug events, 1 was fatal, 31 (6%) were life-threatening, 206 (38%) were serious, and 308 (56%) were significant. Overall, 51% of the adverse drug events were judged to be preventable, including 171 (72%) of the 238 fatal, life-threatening, or serious events and 105 (34%) of the 308 significant events (P < 0.001). Errors resulting in preventable adverse drug events occurred most often at the stages of ordering and monitoring; errors in transcription, dispensing, and administration were less commonly identified. Psychoactive medications (antipsychotics, antidepressants, and sedatives/hypnotics) and anticoagulants were the most common medications associated with preventable adverse drug events. Neuropsychiatric events were the most common types of preventable adverse drug events.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse drug events are common and often preventable in nursing homes. More serious adverse drug events are more likely to be preventable. Prevention strategies should target the ordering and monitoring stages of pharmaceutical care.

摘要

目的

药物不良事件,尤其是那些可能本可预防的事件,是养老院用药方面最严重的问题之一。我们研究了养老院中药物不良事件及潜在药物不良事件的发生率和可预防性。

方法

我们对马萨诸塞州18家社区养老院的所有长期护理居民进行了一项队列研究,观察期为12个月。通过养老院工作人员激发式自我报告以及由经过培训的护士和药剂师调查员定期审查养老院居民记录来检测潜在的药物相关事件。每起事件由2名独立的医生审查员使用结构化的隐式审查流程进行分类,判断其是否构成药物不良事件或潜在药物不良事件(那些可能造成伤害,但因偶然因素或被发现而未造成伤害的事件)、事件的严重程度(显著、严重、危及生命或致命)以及是否可预防。显著事件的例子包括非荨麻疹性皮疹、无相关骨折的跌倒、无需输血或住院治疗的出血以及过度镇静;严重事件的例子包括荨麻疹、伴有骨折的跌倒、需要输血或住院治疗的出血以及谵妄。

结果

在18家参与研究的养老院中,对28839个居民月进行观察期间,共识别出546起药物不良事件(每100居民月1.89起)和188起潜在药物不良事件(每100居民月0.65起)。在药物不良事件中,1起是致命的,31起(6%)是危及生命的,206起(38%)是严重的,308起(56%)是显著的。总体而言,51%的药物不良事件被判定为可预防的,包括238起致命、危及生命或严重事件中的171起(72%)以及308起显著事件中的105起(34%)(P < 0.001)。导致可预防药物不良事件的错误最常发生在医嘱开具和监测阶段;转录、配药和给药方面的错误较少被发现。精神活性药物(抗精神病药、抗抑郁药和镇静催眠药)和抗凝剂是与可预防药物不良事件相关最常见的药物。神经精神事件是可预防药物不良事件最常见的类型。

结论

药物不良事件在养老院中很常见且往往可预防。更严重的药物不良事件更有可能被预防。预防策略应针对药学服务的医嘱开具和监测阶段。

相似文献

1
Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in nursing homes.疗养院中药物不良事件的发生率及可预防性。
Am J Med. 2000 Aug 1;109(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00451-4.
2
The safety of warfarin therapy in the nursing home setting.华法林疗法在养老院环境中的安全性。
Am J Med. 2007 Jun;120(6):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.07.045. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
3
Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting.门诊环境中老年人药物不良事件的发生率及可预防性
JAMA. 2003 Mar 5;289(9):1107-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.9.1107.
4
Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group.药物不良事件和潜在药物不良事件的发生率。对预防的启示。药物不良事件预防研究组
JAMA. 1995 Jul 5;274(1):29-34.
5
The incidence of adverse drug events in two large academic long-term care facilities.两家大型学术性长期护理机构中药物不良事件的发生率。
Am J Med. 2005 Mar;118(3):251-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.09.018.
6
Adverse Events in Long-term Care Residents Transitioning From Hospital Back to Nursing Home.从医院转回疗养院的长期护理居民中的不良事件。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Sep 1;179(9):1254-1261. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2005.
7
Dementia and risk of adverse warfarin-related events in the nursing home setting.养老院环境中痴呆症与华法林相关不良事件的风险
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Oct;10(5):323-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.09.003.
8
Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in hospitalized adults.住院成人药物不良事件的发生率及可预防性
J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Jun;8(6):289-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02600138.
9
Injurious falls in nonambulatory nursing home residents: a comparative study of circumstances, incidence, and risk factors.非行走能力养老院居民的伤害性跌倒:情况、发生率及危险因素的比较研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Mar;44(3):273-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb00913.x.
10
Incidence of adverse drug events in an academic hospital: a prospective cohort study.学术医院中药物不良事件的发生率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Dec;25(6):648-55. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt075. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of Drug-RElated Hospitalizations for Nursing HOme Residents: Cross-Sectional RENHO Study.疗养院居民药物相关住院治疗的特征:横断面RENHO研究
Drug Saf. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01556-3.
2
Clinical Pharmaceutical Care in Nursing Home Residents as a Cornerstone for Drug-Related Problems Identification.疗养院居民的临床药学服务作为药物相关问题识别的基石
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 May;18(5):e70222. doi: 10.1111/cts.70222.
3
Global research trends of home pharmaceutical care: a bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace.
家庭药学服务的全球研究趋势:基于CiteSpace的文献计量分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 28;12:1489720. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1489720. eCollection 2025.
4
Pharmacy Integrated Transitions (PIT) trial: a protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomised crossover trial.药学综合过渡(PIT)试验:一项实用整群随机交叉试验的方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 31;14(12):e088786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088786.
5
Adverse Drug Reactions Among Hospitalized Psychiatric Patients, Prevalence, Severity, Preventability, and Opportunities for Intervention.住院精神科患者的药物不良反应:发生率、严重程度、可预防性及干预机会
Oman Med J. 2024 May 30;39(3):e631. doi: 10.5001/omj.2024.75. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Adverse drug reactions and its associated factors among geriatric hospitalized patients at selected comprehensive specialized hospitals of the Amhara Region, Ethiopia: a multicenter prospective cohort study.在埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区选定的综合专科医院中,老年住院患者的药物不良反应及其相关因素:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 16;24(1):955. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05515-y.
7
Antibiotic consumption patterns in older adults: a comparative study of people 65 years and older in and outside nursing homes, Belgium, 2016 to 2022.老年人抗生素使用模式:2016 年至 2022 年比利时养老院内外 65 岁及以上人群的比较研究。
Euro Surveill. 2024 Nov;29(46). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.46.2400148.
8
Effect of Inpatient Pharmacist-Led Medication Reconciliations on Medication-Related Interventions in Intensive Care Unit Recovery Centers.住院药师主导的用药核对对重症监护病房康复中心药物相关干预措施的影响。
Hosp Pharm. 2024 Dec;59(6):650-659. doi: 10.1177/00185787241269113. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
9
Phenotyping Adherence Through Technology-Enabled Reports and Navigation (the PATTERN Study): Qualitative Study for Intervention Adaptation Using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment Framework.通过技术支持的报告和导航进行表型依从性评估(PATTERN 研究):使用探索、准备、实施和维持框架进行干预调整的定性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 17;8:e54916. doi: 10.2196/54916.
10
Modeling Nursing Home Harms From COVID-19 Staff Furlough Policies.模拟新冠疫情员工停职政策对养老院的危害。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2429613. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29613.