• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院不良事件的披露及其与患者护理质量评分的关联。

Disclosure of hospital adverse events and its association with patients' ratings of the quality of care.

作者信息

López Lenny, Weissman Joel S, Schneider Eric C, Weingart Saul N, Cohen Amy P, Epstein Arnold M

机构信息

MDiv, Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford St, Ninth Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 9;169(20):1888-94. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.387.

DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.387
PMID:19901141
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about how the characteristics of adverse events (AEs) affect the likelihood of disclosure or how the disclosure of an AE relates to patients' perception of quality of care.

METHODS

The study included a random sample of medical and surgical acute care adult patients in Massachusetts hospitals between April 1 and October 1, 2003. The unit of analysis was the AE, and multivariable regression analyses accounted for clustering at the patient level.

RESULTS

Overall, 603 patients reported 845 AEs, and 40% of AEs were disclosed. The AEs that required additional treatment (odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.32) or affected patients who reported good health (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.29-3.24) were more likely to be disclosed. Disclosure was less likely if the events were preventable (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.83) or if the patients were still affected by the AE at the time of survey (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.78). Higher-quality ratings were associated with disclosure (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.39-2.99) of preventable and nonpreventable events and with patients who felt that they were able to protect themselves from AEs (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.21-3.24). Lower-quality ratings were associated with events that were preventable (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.76), with events that caused increased discomfort (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46-0.86), or with events that still adversely affected the patient at the time of the survey (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of disclosure of AEs by medical personnel remain low in hospitalized patients. Disclosure of some of these events is associated with higher ratings of quality by patients.

摘要

背景

关于不良事件(AE)的特征如何影响披露的可能性,或者AE的披露与患者对医疗质量的认知之间的关系,目前所知甚少。

方法

该研究纳入了2003年4月1日至10月1日期间马萨诸塞州医院内科和外科急性护理成年患者的随机样本。分析单位是AE,多变量回归分析考虑了患者层面的聚类情况。

结果

总体而言,603名患者报告了845起AE,其中40%的AE被披露。需要额外治疗的AE(优势比[OR],1.64;95%置信区间[CI],1.16 - 2.32)或影响报告健康状况良好患者的AE(OR,2.04;95% CI,1.29 - 3.24)更有可能被披露。如果事件是可预防的(OR,0.58;95% CI,0.41 - 0.83),或者患者在调查时仍受到AE的影响(OR,0.49;95% CI,0.31 - 0.78),则披露的可能性较小。较高的质量评级与可预防和不可预防事件的披露(OR,2.04;95% CI,1.39 - 2.99)以及患者认为自己能够预防AE的情况相关(OR,1.98;95% CI,1.21 - 3.24)有关。较低的质量评级与可预防的事件(OR,0.55;95% CI,0.40 - 0.76)、导致不适增加的事件(OR,0.62;95% CI,0.46 - 0.86)或在调查时仍对患者产生不利影响的事件(OR,0.68;95% CI,0.46 - 0.98)有关。

结论

住院患者中医疗人员对AE的披露率仍然较低。其中一些事件的披露与患者对更高质量的评级相关。

相似文献

1
Disclosure of hospital adverse events and its association with patients' ratings of the quality of care.医院不良事件的披露及其与患者护理质量评分的关联。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 9;169(20):1888-94. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.387.
2
Entering the second decade of the patient safety movement: the field matures: comment on "disclosure of hospital adverse events and its association with patients' ratings of the quality of care".步入患者安全运动的第二个十年:该领域走向成熟——评《医院不良事件的披露及其与患者护理质量评分的关联》
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 9;169(20):1894-6. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.351.
3
Do medical inpatients who report poor service quality experience more adverse events and medical errors?报告服务质量差的住院患者是否会经历更多不良事件和医疗差错?
Med Care. 2008 Feb;46(2):224-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181589ba4.
4
Patient-reported medication symptoms in primary care.初级保健中患者报告的用药症状。
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jan 24;165(2):234-40. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.2.234.
5
Incidence of adverse events related to health care in Spain: results of the Spanish National Study of Adverse Events.西班牙医疗保健相关不良事件的发生率:西班牙全国不良事件研究结果
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Dec;62(12):1022-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.065227.
6
Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study.荷兰医院中的不良事件及潜在可预防死亡:一项回顾性患者病历审查研究的结果
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Aug;18(4):297-302. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025924.
7
The safety of hospital stroke care.医院中风护理的安全性。
Neurology. 2007 Feb 20;68(8):550-5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000254992.39919.2e.
8
Repeat medication errors in nursing homes: Contributing factors and their association with patient harm.养老院中的重复用药错误:促成因素及其与患者伤害的关联。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010 Jun;8(3):258-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2010.05.005.
9
Impact of adverse events on outcomes in intensive care unit patients.不良事件对重症监护病房患者预后的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):2041-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817b879c.
10
Consumer perceptions of safety in hospitals.消费者对医院安全性的认知。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Feb 22;6:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Open disclosure.公开披露。
BJA Educ. 2024 May;24(5):147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
2
Questioning the Yelp Effect: Mixed Methods Analysis of Web-Based Reviews of Urgent Cares.质疑 Yelp 效应:基于网络的紧急护理评论的混合方法分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 8;23(10):e29406. doi: 10.2196/29406.
3
What Factors Impact Implementation of Critical Incident Disclosure in Ontario Hospitals: A Multiple-Case Study.哪些因素影响安大略省医院实施重大事件披露:多案例研究。
Healthc Policy. 2021 Feb;16(3):76-88. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2021.26431.
4
Preventable medication harm across health care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在医疗保健环境中可预防的药物伤害:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 6;18(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01774-9.
5
Evaluation of accuracy of IHI Trigger Tool in identifying adverse drug events: a prospective observational study.评估 IHI 触发工具识别药物不良事件的准确性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;84(10):2252-2259. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13665. Epub 2018 Jul 8.
6
Frequency, Expected Effects, Obstacles, and Facilitators of Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents: A Systematic Review.患者安全事件披露的频率、预期效果、障碍及促进因素:一项系统综述
J Prev Med Public Health. 2017 Mar;50(2):68-82. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.16.105. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
7
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2017年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
8
Eleven-year descriptive analysis of closed court verdicts on medical errors in Spain and Massachusetts.西班牙和马萨诸塞州关于医疗差错的封闭法庭裁决的十一年描述性分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 30;6(8):e011644. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011644.
9
Interventions in health organisations to reduce the impact of adverse events in second and third victims.针对卫生组织的干预措施,以减轻不良事件对第二受害者和第三受害者的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 22;15:341. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0994-x.
10
Using patients' experiences of adverse events to improve health service delivery and practice: protocol of a data linkage study of Australian adults age 45 and above.利用患者的不良事件经历改善医疗服务提供与实践:一项针对45岁及以上澳大利亚成年人的数据链接研究方案
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 13;4(10):e006599. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006599.