• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孤立性新生儿阴茎头扭转的发病率及预测因素

Incidence and predictive factors of isolated neonatal penile glanular torsion.

作者信息

Sarkis Pierrot E, Sadasivam Muthurajan

机构信息

Pediatric Surgery Section, Saad Specialist Hospital, Hammoud Street, P.O. Box: 30353, Al-Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Pediatr Urol. 2007 Dec;3(6):495-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.03.002. Epub 2007 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.03.002
PMID:18947802
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of isolated neonatal penile glanular torsion, describe the basic characteristics, and explore the relationship between foreskin and glans torsion.

METHODOLOGY

A prospective survey was conducted of all male newborns admitted to nursery after delivery, or neonates less than 3 months presenting for circumcision. Cases with associated genital malformations were excluded.

RESULTS

The incidence of isolated neonatal penile torsion was 27% (95% CI: 22.2%-31.84%), to the left in 99% of cases. In 3.5% of cases, the penis had an angle <10 degrees, and 9.5% >20 degrees. Using Spearman's correlational coefficient, deviation of penile raphe from the midline at the foreskin tip had a better correlation with glans torsion than deviation of raphe at the coronal sulcus (0.727 vs 0.570; both significant at p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Isolated neonatal penile torsion is more common than reported. The median raphe of the penis may be normal and mask unexpected glans torsion. Median raphe torsion at foreskin tip can be used as a predictor for glans torsion. Clinical significance and relation to adult penile torsion are beyond the scope of the study.

摘要

目的

确定孤立性新生儿阴茎头扭转的发生率,描述其基本特征,并探讨包皮与阴茎头扭转之间的关系。

方法

对所有分娩后入住新生儿病房的男婴或小于3个月前来接受包皮环切术的新生儿进行前瞻性调查。排除伴有生殖器畸形的病例。

结果

孤立性新生儿阴茎扭转的发生率为27%(95%可信区间:22.2%-31.84%),99%的病例向左扭转。3.5%的病例阴茎扭转角度<10度,9.5%的病例>20度。使用Spearman相关系数,包皮尖端阴茎缝偏离中线与阴茎头扭转的相关性比冠状沟处阴茎缝偏离更好(0.727对0.570;两者在p<0.01时均具有显著性)。

结论

孤立性新生儿阴茎扭转比报道的更为常见。阴茎中线可能正常,掩盖了意外的阴茎头扭转。包皮尖端中线扭转可作为阴茎头扭转的预测指标。临床意义以及与成人阴茎扭转的关系超出了本研究范围。

相似文献

1
Incidence and predictive factors of isolated neonatal penile glanular torsion.孤立性新生儿阴茎头扭转的发病率及预测因素
J Pediatr Urol. 2007 Dec;3(6):495-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.03.002. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
2
The incidence of isolated penile torsion in North India: A study of 5,018 male neonates.印度北部孤立性阴茎扭转的发病率:一项对5018例男性新生儿的研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Oct;13(5):491.e1-491.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.12.031. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
3
[Penile glans amputation during circumcision: causes, treatments and preventive measures].[包皮环切术中阴茎头切除:原因、治疗及预防措施]
Urologiia. 2021 Sep(4):79-86.
4
Self-ratings of genital anatomy, sexual sensitivity and function in men using the 'Self-Assessment of Genital Anatomy and Sexual Function, Male' questionnaire.使用“男性生殖器官解剖与性功能自我评估”问卷对男性生殖器官解剖、性敏感度及功能进行自我评定。
BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103(8):1096-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08166.x. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
5
[Circumcision affects glans penis vibration perception threshold].包皮环切术影响阴茎头振动感觉阈值
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2008 Apr;14(4):328-30.
6
Standard penile size for normal full term newborns in the Saudi population.沙特人群中正常足月新生儿的标准阴茎尺寸。
Saudi Med J. 2002 Mar;23(3):314-6.
7
Use of buccal mucosa to simulate the coronal sulcus after traumatic penile amputation.外伤性阴茎离断后使用颊黏膜模拟冠状沟。
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5):1109. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.010.
8
Isolated penile torsion in newborns.新生儿孤立性阴茎扭转
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(11-12):E805-7. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2833. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
9
Long-term results of brachytherapy for carcinoma of the penis confined to the glans (N- or NX).局限于龟头(N-或NX)的阴茎癌近距离放射治疗的长期结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jul 15;74(4):1150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.09.054. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
10
Characteristics of the male genitalia in the newborn: penis.
J Urol. 1985 Sep;134(3):521-2. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)47272-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Dartos flap rotation for severe congenital penile torsion in a nine-year-old: a case report and surgical insights.九岁患儿严重先天性阴茎扭转的肉膜瓣旋转术:一例报告及手术见解
J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Mar 27;2025(3):rjaf164. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaf164. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Role of Long-Chain Cyanoacrylate as an Adjunct Interposition Layer in Repair of Hypospadias and Urethrocutaneous Fistula in Children: A Novel Technique.长链氰基丙烯酸酯作为儿童尿道下裂和尿道皮肤瘘修复中辅助插入层的作用:一种新技术
Cureus. 2024 Apr 5;16(4):e57693. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57693. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Severe penile torsion of 180 degrees in an adult patient: a uro-radiological case report.
一名成年患者发生180度严重阴茎扭转:一例泌尿放射学病例报告。
J Med Life. 2023 Oct;16(10):1566-1570. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0113.
4
Procedures used for correction of isolated penile torsion: are they competitive or complementary?用于矫正孤立性阴茎扭转的手术方法:它们是竞争关系还是互补关系?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Aug;51(8):1313-1319. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02163-9. Epub 2019 May 10.
5
Penile degloving and dorsal dartos flap rotation approach for the management of isolated penile torsion.阴茎脱套术联合阴茎背侧肉膜瓣旋转术治疗孤立性阴茎扭转
Turk J Urol. 2016 Mar;42(1):27-31. doi: 10.5152/tud.2015.34651.
6
Isolated penile torsion in newborns.新生儿孤立性阴茎扭转
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(11-12):E805-7. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2833. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
7
The management of moderate and severe congenital penile torsion associated with hypospadias: Urethral mobilisation is not a panacea against torsion.与尿道下裂相关的中重度先天性阴茎扭转的治疗:尿道游离术并非扭转问题的万灵药。
Arab J Urol. 2013 Mar;11(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.12.004. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
8
Benign penile skin anomalies in children: a primer for pediatricians.儿童良性阴茎皮肤异常:儿科医生入门指南
World J Pediatr. 2015 Nov;11(4):316-23. doi: 10.1007/s12519-015-0015-5. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
9
Deviation of the penoscrotal median raphe: Is it a normal finding or within the spectrum of hypospadias?阴茎阴囊中缝偏移:这是正常表现还是属于尿道下裂的范畴?
Indian J Plast Surg. 2014 Jan;47(1):92-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.129630.