Bennett Albert S, Anex Robert P
Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Room 3202 NSRIC Building, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Bioresour Technol. 2009 Feb;100(4):1595-607. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.023. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
Sweet sorghum has been identified as a possible ethanol feedstock because of its biomass yield and high concentration of readily fermentable sugars. It has found limited use, however, because of poor post-harvest storage characteristics and short harvest window in cooler climates. Previous research (Bennett, A.S., Anex, R.P., 2008. Farm-gate production costs of sweet sorghum as a bioethanol feedstock. Transactions of the ASABE 51(2), 603-613) indicates that fermentable carbohydrates (FC) can be produced at less expense from sweet sorghum than from corn grain. Previous research, however, did not include costs associated with off-farm transportation, storage, or capital costs associated with milling and energy recovery equipment that are required to provide FC suitable for biological conversion. This study includes these additional costs and reevaluates sweet sorghum as a biocommodity feedstock. A total of eight harvest-transport-processing options are modeled, including 4-row self-propelled and 2-row tractor-pulled forage harvesters, two different modes of in-field transport, fresh processing, on-farm ensilage and at-plant ensilage. Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis are used to account for system variability and compare scenarios. Transportation costs are found to be significant ranging from $33 to $71 Mg (-1) FC, with highest costs associated with at-plant ensilage scenarios. Economies of scale benefit larger milling equipment and boiler systems reducing FC costs by more than 50% when increasing annual plant capacity from 37.9 to 379 million liters. Ensiled storage of high moisture sweet sorghum in bunkers can lead to significant losses of FC (>20%) and result in systems with net FC costs well above those of corn-derived FC. Despite relatively high transport costs, seasonal, fresh processed sweet sorghum is found to produce FC at costs competitive with corn grain derived FC.
甜高粱因其生物量产量和高浓度易发酵糖而被确定为一种可能的乙醇原料。然而,由于其收获后储存特性较差以及在较凉爽气候下收获窗口较短,其用途有限。先前的研究(Bennett, A.S., Anex, R.P., 2008. 甜高粱作为生物乙醇原料的农场门生产成本。美国农业与生物工程师学会会刊51(2), 603 - 613)表明,从甜高粱生产可发酵碳水化合物(FC)的成本低于从玉米籽粒生产的成本。然而,先前的研究并未包括与场外运输、储存相关的成本,或与提供适合生物转化的FC所需的研磨和能量回收设备相关的资本成本。本研究纳入了这些额外成本,并重新评估甜高粱作为生物商品原料的情况。总共对八种收获 - 运输 - 加工方案进行了建模,包括4行自走式和2行牵引式青贮收获机、两种不同的田间运输模式、新鲜加工、农场青贮和工厂青贮。使用蒙特卡罗模拟和敏感性分析来考虑系统变异性并比较不同方案。发现运输成本显著,从每公吨FC 33美元到71美元不等,与工厂青贮方案相关的成本最高。规模经济有利于更大的研磨设备和锅炉系统,当将年工厂产能从3.79亿升增加到37.9亿升时,FC成本降低超过50%。在青贮窖中对高水分甜高粱进行青贮储存会导致FC大量损失(>20%),并导致系统的净FC成本远高于玉米衍生的FC。尽管运输成本相对较高,但发现季节性新鲜加工的甜高粱生产FC的成本与玉米籽粒衍生的FC具有竞争力。