Visser J E, Allum J H J, Carpenter M G, Esselink R A J, Limousin-Dowsey P, Honegger F, Borm G F, Bloem B R
Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Neuroscience. 2008 Dec 10;157(4):798-812. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.09.051. Epub 2008 Oct 4.
Stereotactic surgical interventions for Parkinson's disease (PD) can considerably improve appendicular motor signs, but their effect on axial motor signs--especially balance control under optimal drug therapy--remains unclear. Here, we investigated the effect of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation on levodopa-resistant axial and appendicular postural impairment in PD. Fourteen patients (11 with young-onset PD) and 18 age-matched controls were included. Patients were tested after intake of a suprathreshold levodopa dose, ensuring optimal response to drug therapy, and with stimulators both turned on and off. Balance control was assessed using multidirectional dynamic posturography. Outcome measures included full body kinematics and surface electromyography of paraspinal and deltoid muscles. Patients with stimulators turned off showed early decreased trunk roll with a loss of directional dependency, followed by increased and abnormally directed--i.e. destabilizing--trunk roll. Pelvis pitch motion showed decreased directional dependency in these patients. The abnormal trunk motion was not corrected by STN stimulation, but directional dependency of both trunk and pelvis motion partially improved, along with a general decrease in muscle activity. Even with stimulators off, protective arm movements were similar in the optimally treated patients and controls, indicating that these appendicular signs respond better to dopaminergic treatment than axial motor control. Our findings indicate that instability in PD results from a reduced flexibility of the trunk and pelvis that is largely resistant to STN stimulation combined with optimal drug treatment. These postural abnormalities are therefore likely associated with non-dopaminergic pathology. In contrast, protective arm movements did appear to be levodopa-responsive. Future studies should focus on identifying subgroups of optimal responders, particularly patients with levodopa-induced dyskinesias.
帕金森病(PD)的立体定向手术干预可显著改善肢体运动症状,但其对轴性运动症状的影响——尤其是在最佳药物治疗下的平衡控制——仍不清楚。在此,我们研究了双侧丘脑底核(STN)刺激对PD中左旋多巴抵抗性轴性和肢体姿势障碍的影响。纳入了14名患者(11名早发型PD患者)和18名年龄匹配的对照者。患者在摄入超阈值左旋多巴剂量后进行测试,以确保对药物治疗有最佳反应,且刺激器开启和关闭时均进行测试。使用多向动态姿势描记法评估平衡控制。结果测量包括全身运动学以及椎旁肌和三角肌的表面肌电图。刺激器关闭的患者表现出早期躯干滚动减少且失去方向依赖性,随后躯干滚动增加且方向异常——即不稳定——。这些患者的骨盆俯仰运动显示方向依赖性降低。STN刺激并未纠正异常的躯干运动,但躯干和骨盆运动的方向依赖性部分得到改善,同时肌肉活动总体减少。即使刺激器关闭,最佳治疗的患者和对照者的保护性手臂运动也相似,这表明这些肢体症状对多巴胺能治疗的反应比对轴性运动控制的反应更好。我们的研究结果表明,PD中的不稳定性源于躯干和骨盆柔韧性降低,这种降低在很大程度上对STN刺激和最佳药物治疗具有抗性。因此,这些姿势异常可能与非多巴胺能病理相关。相比之下,保护性手臂运动似乎对左旋多巴有反应。未来的研究应专注于确定最佳反应者的亚组,特别是患有左旋多巴诱导的运动障碍的患者。