Kastelein Marlous, Wagemakers Harry P A, Luijsterburg Pim A J, Verhaar Jan A N, Koes Bart W, Bierma-Zeinstra Sita M A
Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Am J Med. 2008 Nov;121(11):982-988.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.05.041.
To assess the diagnostic value of history-taking and physical examination of medial collateral ligament lesions after a knee injury presenting in general practice.
Patients aged 18 to 65 years with a traumatic knee injury who consulted their general practitioner within 5 weeks after trauma filled out a questionnaire, underwent a standardized physical examination, and underwent a magnetic resonance imaging scan. Logistic regression analysis was used to test possible associations between determinants from history-taking/physical examination and medial collateral ligament lesions. The diagnostic value of history-taking and physical examination was determined for those variables indicating an association (P <.15) with medial collateral ligament lesions and was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and likelihood ratios.
Of the 134 patients included in this study, 35 had a medial collateral ligament lesion seen on magnetic resonance imaging scan. From history-taking, the determinants "trauma by external force to leg" and "rotational trauma" showed an association with medial collateral ligament lesion after multivariate analysis (P <.15). From physical examination, "pain valgus stress 30 degrees " and "laxity valgus stress 30 degrees " showed an association (P <.15). Isolated determinants from history-taking and physical examination showed some diagnostic value; the likelihood ratio positive was 2.0 for "trauma by external force to leg" and 2.3 for "pain valgus stress 30 degrees ." Adding "pain valgus stress 30 degrees " and "laxity valgus stress 30 degrees " from physical examination to history-taking improved the diagnostic value to a likelihood ratio positive of 6.4.
Medial collateral ligament lesions are frequently seen in patients with traumatic knee injury. History-taking has a diagnostic value, while adding physical examination increases the diagnostic value.
评估在全科医疗中,针对膝关节损伤后内侧副韧带损伤进行病史采集和体格检查的诊断价值。
年龄在18至65岁之间、膝关节外伤后5周内咨询全科医生的患者填写问卷,接受标准化体格检查,并进行磁共振成像扫描。采用逻辑回归分析来检验病史采集/体格检查的决定因素与内侧副韧带损伤之间的可能关联。对于那些表明与内侧副韧带损伤有关联(P<.15)的变量,确定病史采集和体格检查的诊断价值,并通过敏感性、特异性、预测值和似然比进行评估。
本研究纳入的134例患者中,35例在磁共振成像扫描中发现内侧副韧带损伤。在病史采集中,多因素分析后“腿部受到外力创伤”和“旋转性创伤”这两个决定因素显示与内侧副韧带损伤有关联(P<.15)。在体格检查中,“30度外翻应力时疼痛”和“30度外翻应力时松弛”显示有关联(P<.15)。病史采集和体格检查中的单独决定因素显示出一定的诊断价值;“腿部受到外力创伤”的阳性似然比为2.0,“30度外翻应力时疼痛”的阳性似然比为2.3。将体格检查中的“30度外翻应力时疼痛”和“30度外翻应力时松弛”添加到病史采集中,可将诊断价值提高到阳性似然比为6.4。
内侧副韧带损伤在膝关节外伤患者中很常见。病史采集具有诊断价值,而增加体格检查可提高诊断价值。