• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)后下盏结石清除的预测因素:放射学解剖结构的影响

Predictive factors of lower calyceal stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): the impact of radiological anatomy.

作者信息

Lin Chih-Chieh, Hsu Yen-Shen, Chen Kuang-Kuo

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

J Chin Med Assoc. 2008 Oct;71(10):496-501. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(08)70157-6.

DOI:10.1016/S1726-4901(08)70157-6
PMID:18955183
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was carried out to determine whether or not there is a significant relationship between the radiologic anatomy of the lower calyx, as seen on preoperative intravenous urography (IVU), and the outcome of stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower renal calyceal stones.

METHODS

Between June 1998 and April 2007, 112 patients with a solitary lower renal calyceal stone measuring 20 mm or less in size were enrolled in this retrospective study. Pretreatment IVU was reviewed for measuring the anatomical predictors, such as lower pole infundibular length, infundibular width (IW) and infundibulopelvic angle, while the stone location and size were determined on plain abdominal X-ray. All patients were treated with ESWL using a Siemens Lithostar Plus lithotriptor and were followed-up for the outcome of stone clearance 3 months after ESWL with plain abdominal X-ray films and ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Three months after ESWL, only 49 (43.7%) patients were stone-free. Under multivariate analysis with logistic regression, smaller stone size (10 mm or less, p = 0.005) and greater IW (4 mm or more, p = 0.029) were significant favourable predictors for better stone clearance.

CONCLUSION

In addition to the influence of stone size, lower pole anatomy, especially IW, has a significant impact on stone clearance for lower calyceal stone after ESWL.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定术前静脉肾盂造影(IVU)所示下肾盏的放射学解剖结构与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗下肾盏结石后的结石清除结果之间是否存在显著关系。

方法

在1998年6月至2007年4月期间,112例孤立性下肾盏结石大小在20mm及以下的患者纳入本回顾性研究。回顾术前IVU以测量解剖学预测指标,如下极漏斗部长度、漏斗部宽度(IW)和漏斗肾盂角,同时在腹部平片上确定结石位置和大小。所有患者均使用西门子Lithostar Plus碎石机进行ESWL治疗,并在ESWL后3个月通过腹部平片和超声检查对结石清除结果进行随访。

结果

ESWL后3个月,仅49例(43.7%)患者结石清除。经逻辑回归多因素分析,较小的结石大小(10mm及以下,p = 0.005)和较大的IW(4mm及以上,p = 0.029)是结石清除效果较好的显著有利预测指标。

结论

除结石大小的影响外,下极解剖结构,尤其是IW,对ESWL治疗下肾盏结石后的结石清除有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Predictive factors of lower calyceal stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): the impact of radiological anatomy.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)后下盏结石清除的预测因素:放射学解剖结构的影响
J Chin Med Assoc. 2008 Oct;71(10):496-501. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(08)70157-6.
2
Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy.冲击波碎石术或输尿管镜检查术后下盏结石清除率:下极影像学解剖结构的影响
J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):676-82.
3
Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.解剖学肾盂肾盏形态对体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾下盏结石的影响
Int J Urol. 2005 Jun;12(6):525-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x.
4
Lower pole ratio: a new and accurate predictor of lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy?下极比率:冲击波碎石术后下极结石清除的一种新的准确预测指标?
Int J Urol. 2004 Sep;11(9):700-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00877.x.
5
Predictors of lower pole renal stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术后下极肾结石清除的预测因素
J Urol. 2002 Oct;168(4 Pt 1):1344-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64445-X.
6
Predictive factors of lower calyceal stone clearance after Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL): a focus on the infundibulopelvic anatomy.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)后下盏结石清除的预测因素:聚焦于肾盂漏斗部解剖结构
Eur Urol. 2005 Aug;48(2):296-302; discussion 302. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.017. Epub 2005 Mar 9.
7
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system?下盏结石的体外冲击波碎石术:集合系统的解剖结构对治疗结果有多大影响?
Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):539-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.058. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
8
[Usefulness of lower ihfundibular length-to-diameter ratio as a predictor of lower pole stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; clinical research with two lithotriptors].[较低的肾盂漏斗部长度与直径比值作为体外冲击波碎石术后下极结石清除预测指标的有效性;两种碎石机的临床研究]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2003 Sep;94(6):608-13. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.94.608.
9
Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones?下极肾盏解剖结构能否预测原发性下极肾结石体外冲击波碎石术的成功率?
J Urol. 2002 Dec;168(6):2377-82; discussion 2382. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64149-3.
10
The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.肾盂肾盏解剖结构对小儿下极结石冲击波碎石术后结石清除的影响。
J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):1082-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000135670.83076.5c.

引用本文的文献

1
How to maximize the efficacy of shockwave lithotripsy.如何使冲击波碎石术的疗效最大化。
Turk J Urol. 2020 Nov;46(Supp. 1):S19-S26. doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20441. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
2
Revisiting the morphology of pelvicalyceal system in human cadaveric kidneys with a systematic review of literature.通过对文献的系统回顾重新审视人体尸体肾脏肾盂肾盏系统的形态学
Asian J Urol. 2019 Jul;6(3):249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
3
A novel triple oral regime provides effective analgesia during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones.
一种新型三联口服方案在肾结石体外冲击波碎石术中可提供有效的镇痛效果。
Urol Ann. 2019 Jan-Mar;11(1):66-71. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_15_18.
4
Percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy for the passage of lower pole kidney stones following shock wave lithotripsy.冲击波碎石术后下极肾结石排出的叩击、利尿及倒立法治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 8;2013(12):CD008569. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008569.pub2.
5
Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm.比较冲击波碎石术和软性输尿管肾镜术治疗小于1厘米的下极结石的前瞻性随机试验。
Urolithiasis. 2014 Apr;42(2):127-31. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0618-z. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
6
Efficacy of the lithotripsy in treating lower pole renal stones.碎石术治疗肾下极结石的疗效。
Urolithiasis. 2013 Jun;41(3):231-4. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0549-8. Epub 2013 Mar 3.