• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型三联口服方案在肾结石体外冲击波碎石术中可提供有效的镇痛效果。

A novel triple oral regime provides effective analgesia during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones.

作者信息

Choudhary Arpan, Basu Supriya, Sharma Rakesh, Gupta Rupesh, Das Ranjit Kumar, Dey Ranjan Kumar

机构信息

Department of Urology, R. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Department of Urology, Apex Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

Urol Ann. 2019 Jan-Mar;11(1):66-71. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_15_18.

DOI:10.4103/UA.UA_15_18
PMID:30787574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6362787/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Analgesia during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stone is an essential component. It not only makes the procedure comfortable but also increases the stone-free rate.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of triple oral analgesic agents on stone fragmentation and pain relief in comparison to injectable analgesic agents.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This prospective randomized study included 68 patients of renal calculi of size 5-15 mm.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Group A had 32 patients, who received injection pentazocine and injection diclofenac, 45 min before the procedure. Group B consisted of 28 patients, who received a combination of oral acetaminophen, 325 mg, oral diclofenac 50 mg, and oral tramadol 37.5 mg, 45 min prior. Procedural findings, pain score visual analog scale (VAS), fragmentation rate, and outcome were recorded.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Independent -test and Pearson's correlation test.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 40.2 ± 11.8 years. Both groups were comparable in body mass index, stone size, number, and density. Group A required more shocks than Group B (4274 vs. 3693, = 0.043). A lower energy level of shocks (kV) was tolerated in Group A (2.5 vs. 3.2, = 0.002). Group A required more sittings than Group B (2.3 vs. 1.9, = 0.037). VAS score was significantly less in Group B (2.9 vs. 4.9, = 0.0001). The overall fragmentation rate was similar among groups (81.2% vs. 89.3%); hence, the successful outcome was (59.4% vs. 75.0%, = 0.274). The occurrence of adverse events was also equivalent in both groups ( = 0.199).

CONCLUSIONS

Triple oral regime provides better analgesic effect and quicker stone-free rate than injectable agents but with similar final outcome.

摘要

背景

体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石时的镇痛是一个重要组成部分。它不仅能使手术过程更舒适,还能提高结石清除率。

目的

本研究的目的是评估三联口服镇痛药与注射用镇痛药相比对结石破碎和疼痛缓解的疗效。

设置与设计

这项前瞻性随机研究纳入了68例结石大小为5 - 15毫米的肾结石患者。

对象与方法

A组有32例患者,在手术前45分钟接受喷他佐辛注射液和双氯芬酸注射液。B组由28例患者组成,在术前45分钟接受325毫克对乙酰氨基酚、50毫克双氯芬酸和37.5毫克曲马多的联合口服。记录手术结果、疼痛评分视觉模拟量表(VAS)、破碎率和结局。

使用的统计分析

独立t检验和Pearson相关检验。

结果

共分析了60例患者。平均年龄为40.2±11.8岁。两组在体重指数、结石大小、数量和密度方面具有可比性。A组比B组需要更多的冲击波次数(4274次对3693次,P = 0.043)。A组能耐受的较低能量水平的冲击波(千伏)(2.5对3.2,P = 0.002)。A组比B组需要更多的治疗次数(2.3次对1.9次,P = 0.037)。B组的VAS评分显著更低(2.9对4.9,P = 0.0001)。两组的总体破碎率相似(81.2%对89.3%);因此,成功结局相似(59.4%对75.0%,P = 0.274)。两组不良事件的发生率也相当(P = 0.199)。

结论

三联口服方案比注射用药物具有更好的镇痛效果和更快的结石清除率,但最终结局相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b81f/6362787/e1472bc1cf75/UA-11-66-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b81f/6362787/358f3dfc9384/UA-11-66-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b81f/6362787/e1472bc1cf75/UA-11-66-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b81f/6362787/358f3dfc9384/UA-11-66-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b81f/6362787/e1472bc1cf75/UA-11-66-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A novel triple oral regime provides effective analgesia during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones.一种新型三联口服方案在肾结石体外冲击波碎石术中可提供有效的镇痛效果。
Urol Ann. 2019 Jan-Mar;11(1):66-71. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_15_18.
2
Effectiveness of electro-acupuncture compared to sedo-analgesics in relieving pain during shockwave lithotripsy.与镇静镇痛药相比,电针在缓解冲击波碎石术期间疼痛方面的有效性。
Urol Res. 2005 Aug;33(4):285-90. doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0473-7. Epub 2005 Jun 22.
3
Intracutaneous sterile water injection for pain relief during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: comparison with diclofenac sodium.皮内注射无菌水在体外冲击波碎石术中缓解疼痛:与双氯芬酸钠的比较。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Apr;48(2):103-108. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01147-9. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
4
Predictive risk factors for pain during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术期间疼痛的预测性风险因素。
J Endourol. 2009 Dec;23(12):2021-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0111.
5
Paravertebral block is a proper alternative anesthesia for outpatient lithotripsy.椎旁阻滞是门诊体外冲击波碎石术合适的替代麻醉方法。
Anesth Essays Res. 2013 Sep-Dec;7(3):365-70. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.123238.
6
Predicting effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy by stone attenuation value.通过结石衰减值预测体外冲击波碎石术的疗效。
J Endourol. 2010 Jul;24(7):1169-73. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0124.
7
Comparison of three analgesic drug regimens with twelfth subcostal nerve block for pain control during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.三种镇痛药物方案联合第十二肋下神经阻滞在体外冲击波碎石术治疗中的镇痛效果比较。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Jan;50(1):49-53. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1746-0. Epub 2017 Nov 18.
8
The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi.体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立性下盏结石与孤立性中、上盏结石的疗效比较。
J Urol. 2001 Dec;166(6):2081-4; discussion 2085. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65509-7.
9
Comparison of three different analgesic protocols during shockwave lithotripsy.比较冲击波碎石术期间三种不同镇痛方案的效果。
J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):691-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0004. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
10
Use of patient-controlled analgesia in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.患者自控镇痛在体外冲击波碎石术中的应用。
Br J Urol. 1997 Jun;79(6):848-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00212.x.

本文引用的文献

1
The success of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy based on the stone-attenuation value from non-contrast computed tomography.基于非增强计算机断层扫描的结石衰减值的体外冲击波碎石术的成功率。
Arab J Urol. 2014 Jun;12(2):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
2
Paravertebral block is a proper alternative anesthesia for outpatient lithotripsy.椎旁阻滞是门诊体外冲击波碎石术合适的替代麻醉方法。
Anesth Essays Res. 2013 Sep-Dec;7(3):365-70. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.123238.
3
Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy: a comprehensive review.
优化冲击波碎石术:一项综合综述。
Rev Urol. 2013;15(2):49-60.
4
Comparative study between three analgesic agents for the pain management during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.三种镇痛剂用于体外冲击波碎石术疼痛管理的对比研究
Urol J. 2013 Sep 26;10(3):942-5.
5
Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.美国肾结石的患病率。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052. Epub 2012 Mar 31.
6
Quantitative assessment of shockwave lithotripsy accuracy and the effect of respiratory motion.冲击波碎石术准确性的定量评估及呼吸运动的影响。
J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):1070-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0042. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
7
Comparison of three different analgesic protocols during shockwave lithotripsy.比较冲击波碎石术期间三种不同镇痛方案的效果。
J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):691-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0004. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
8
Factors affecting urinary calculi treatment by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.影响体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石的因素。
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2010 Jul;21(4):660-5.
9
Randomized comparison of efficacy of paracetamol, lornoxicam, and tramadol representing three different groups of analgesics for pain control in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.随机比较对乙酰氨基酚、氯诺昔康和曲马多三种不同类别的镇痛药在体外冲击波碎石术疼痛控制中的疗效。
J Endourol. 2010 Apr;24(4):615-20. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0483.
10
Predictive risk factors for pain during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术期间疼痛的预测性风险因素。
J Endourol. 2009 Dec;23(12):2021-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0111.