• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Utilizing peer academic detailing to improve childhood immunization coverage levels.

作者信息

Boom Julie A, Nelson Cynthia S, Kohrt Alan E, Kozinetz Claudia A

机构信息

Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2010 May;11(3):377-86. doi: 10.1177/1524839908321487. Epub 2008 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1177/1524839908321487
PMID:18955545
Abstract

Interventions that utilize academic detailing to improve childhood immunization have been implemented across the country. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an academic detailing intervention to increase childhood immunization rates in pediatric and family medicine practices in a major metropolitan area. Educational teams of one physician, nurse, and office manager delivered 83 peer education sessions at practices in the intervention group. Postintervention immunization rates for children 12-23 months of age increased 1% in the intervention group and decreased 3% in the control group. Postintervention coverage levels for children 12-23 months of age did not differ between the intervention and control groups. Results indicated this office-based intervention was not sufficient to effect measurable changes in immunization coverage levels after 1 year of participation. Future interventions need to provide initial feedback regarding practice immunization coverage levels prior to the educational interventions and include multiple encounters.

摘要

相似文献

1
Utilizing peer academic detailing to improve childhood immunization coverage levels.
Health Promot Pract. 2010 May;11(3):377-86. doi: 10.1177/1524839908321487. Epub 2008 Oct 27.
2
Improvement in provider immunization knowledge and behaviors following a peer education intervention.同伴教育干预后医疗服务提供者免疫知识与行为的改善。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2007 Oct;46(8):706-17. doi: 10.1177/0009922807301484. Epub 2007 May 23.
3
Effectiveness of a physician peer educator in improving the quality of immunization services for young children in primary care practices.医师同伴教育者对提高基层医疗实践中幼儿免疫服务质量的有效性。
Vaccine. 2008 Aug 5;26(33):4256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.05.047. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a practice-based immunization education intervention.基于实践的免疫教育干预措施的成本效益分析
Ambul Pediatr. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):167-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2006.12.001.
5
Implementation of universal influenza immunization recommendations for healthy young children: results of a randomized, controlled trial with registry-based recall.对健康幼儿实施通用流感免疫建议:一项基于登记召回的随机对照试验结果
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):146-54. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1804.
6
A model immunization demonstration for preschoolers in an inner-city barrio, San Diego, California, 1992-1994.1992 - 1994年在加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥市一个市中心贫民区为学龄前儿童开展的示范性免疫接种活动。
Am J Prev Med. 1996 Jul-Aug;12(4 Suppl):8-13.
7
Improving childhood immunizations in a family practice office.改善家庭医疗诊所的儿童免疫接种情况。
Del Med J. 1997 Jan;69(1):13-9.
8
Effectiveness of chart prompt about immunizations in an urban health center.城市健康中心中关于免疫接种的图表提示的有效性。
J Fam Pract. 2002 Dec;51(12):1018.
9
The effect of patient education on pediatric immunization rates.患者教育对儿童免疫接种率的影响。
J Fam Pract. 1992 Sep;35(3):288-93.
10
Group versus individual academic detailing to improve the use of antihypertensive medications in primary care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.小组与个体学术推广以改善基层医疗中抗高血压药物的使用:一项整群随机对照试验。
Am J Med. 2005 May;118(5):521-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.12.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Communicating effectively with patients about vaccination: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.与患者就疫苗接种进行有效沟通:随机对照试验的系统评价
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2023 Aug 1;49(7-8):331-341. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v49i78a05.
2
Not for industry only: medical students and office-based academic detailing the PIVOT (Pregnant women Influenza Vaccine Optimization Team) initiative.不仅面向行业:医学生和基于办公室的学术人员详述PIVOT(孕妇流感疫苗优化团队)倡议。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015 Apr 15;6:323-7. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S72384. eCollection 2015.
3
The association between intentional delay of vaccine administration and timely childhood vaccination coverage.
疫苗接种延误与儿童及时接种疫苗覆盖率之间的关联。
Public Health Rep. 2010 Jul-Aug;125(4):534-41. doi: 10.1177/003335491012500408.