Suppr超能文献

顶空单滴微萃取和中空纤维液相微萃取用于高效液相色谱法测定酚类物质。

Headspace single drop and hollow fiber liquid phase microextractions for HPLC determination of phenols.

作者信息

Wu Yunli, Hu Bin, Hou Yanli

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

J Sep Sci. 2008 Dec;31(21):3772-81. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200800365.

Abstract

Two methods based on headspace single drop microextraction (HS-SDME) and headspace hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction (HS-HF-LPME) were developed and critically compared with HPLC-UV determination of phenols (including phenol (Ph), 2-chlorophenol (CP), 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP) and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP)) in this paper. The significant parameters affecting the extraction efficiency of the target analytes in both extraction modes were studied and the optimal extraction conditions were established. Under the optimal conditions, the detection limits (S/N = 3) for Ph, CP, DCP and TCP obtained by HS-SDME-HPLC-UV and HS-HF-LPME-HPLC-UV were 2.1, 0.2, 0.8,1.1 ng/mL and 4.2, 0.4, 0.4, 0.4 ng/mL with enrichment factors of 15.8, 198.9, 159.7, 194.8 and 9.2, 149.9, 301.9, 411.1, respectively. The RSDs obtained by HS-SDME-HPLC-UV and HS-HF-LPME-HPLC-UV were 3.7, 4.0, 9.8, 6.7% and 6.3, 3.6, 3.1, 4.8% for Ph, CP, DCP and TCP, respectively. Both extraction modes have a comparable analytical performance, but HS-HF-LPME was more robust than HS-SDME, while HS-SDME was simpler than HS-HF-LPME. The two headspace microextraction modes were applied for HPLC-UV determination of target phenols in water, honey and toner samples, and the determined values obtained by both techniques were in good agreement with each other.

摘要

本文开发了基于顶空单滴微萃取(HS-SDME)和顶空中空纤维液相微萃取(HS-HF-LPME)的两种方法,并与高效液相色谱-紫外检测法(HPLC-UV)测定酚类物质(包括苯酚(Ph)、2-氯苯酚(CP)、2,4-二氯苯酚(DCP)和2,4,6-三氯苯酚(TCP))进行了严格比较。研究了两种萃取模式下影响目标分析物萃取效率的重要参数,并建立了最佳萃取条件。在最佳条件下,HS-SDME-HPLC-UV和HS-HF-LPME-HPLC-UV法测定Ph、CP、DCP和TCP的检测限(S/N = 3)分别为2.1、0.2、0.8、1.1 ng/mL和4.2、0.4、0.4、0.4 ng/mL,富集因子分别为15.8、198.9、159.7、194.8和9.2、149.9、301.9、411.1。HS-SDME-HPLC-UV和HS-HF-LPME-HPLC-UV法测定Ph、CP、DCP和TCP的相对标准偏差(RSD)分别为3.7%、4.0%、9.8%、6.7%和6.3%、3.6%、3.1%、4.8%。两种萃取模式具有相当的分析性能,但HS-HF-LPME比HS-SDME更稳健,而HS-SDME比HS-HF-LPME更简单。两种顶空微萃取模式应用于HPLC-UV法测定水、蜂蜜和调色剂样品中的目标酚类物质,两种技术测定值彼此吻合良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验