DiBlasi Robert M, Salyer John W, Zignego Jay C, Redding Gregory J, Richardson C Peter
Respiratory Care Department, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Respir Care. 2008 Nov;53(11):1450-60.
Small endotracheal tubes (ETTs) and neonatal ventilators can impact gas exchange, work of breathing, and lung-mechanics measurements in infants, by increasing the expiratory resistance (R(E)) to gas flow.
We tested two each of the Babylog 8000plus, Avea, Carestation, and Servo-i ventilators. In the first phase of the study we evaluated (1) the imposed R(E) of an ETT and ventilator system during simulated passive breathing at various tidal volume (V(T)), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and frequency settings, and (2) the intrinsic PEEP at various ventilator settings. In the second phase of this study we evaluated the imposed expiratory work of breathing (WOB) of the ETT and ventilator system at various PEEP levels during simulated spontaneous breathing using an infant lung model. Pressure and flow were measured continuously, and we calculated the imposed R(E) of the ETT and each ventilator, and the intrinsic PEEP with various PEEP, V(T), and frequency settings. We measured the imposed expiratory WOB with several PEEP levels during a simulated spontaneous breathing pattern.
The ventilator's contribution to the imposed R(E) was greater than that of the ETT with nearly all of the ventilators tested. There were significant differences in ventilator-imposed R(E) between the ventilator brands at various PEEP, V(T), and frequency settings. The Babylog 8000plus consistently had the lowest ventilator-imposed R(E) in the majority of the test conditions. There was no intrinsic PEEP (>1 cm H(2)O) in any of the test conditions with any ventilator brand. There were also no significant differences in the imposed expiratory WOB between ventilator brands during simulated spontaneous breathing.
The major cause of R(E) appears to be the ventilator exhalation valve. Neonatal ventilators that use a set constant flow during inhalation and exhalation appear to have less R(E) than ventilators that use a variable bias flow during exhalation. Clinical studies are needed to determine whether the imposed R(E) of these ventilator designs impacts gas exchange, lung mechanics, or ventilator weaning.
小儿气管内插管(ETT)和新生儿呼吸机可通过增加气流的呼气阻力(R(E))来影响婴儿的气体交换、呼吸功及肺力学测量。
我们对Babylog 8000plus、Avea、Carestation和Servo-i呼吸机各测试两台。在研究的第一阶段,我们评估了:(1)在不同潮气量(V(T))、呼气末正压(PEEP)和频率设置下模拟被动呼吸时ETT和呼吸机系统的外加R(E);(2)不同呼吸机设置下的内源性PEEP。在本研究的第二阶段,我们使用婴儿肺模型评估了在模拟自主呼吸时不同PEEP水平下ETT和呼吸机系统的外加呼气呼吸功(WOB)。持续测量压力和流量,我们计算了ETT和各呼吸机的外加R(E)以及不同PEEP、V(T)和频率设置下的内源性PEEP。我们在模拟自主呼吸模式下测量了几种PEEP水平时的外加呼气WOB。
在几乎所有测试的呼吸机中,呼吸机对外加R(E)的影响大于ETT。在不同的PEEP、V(T)和频率设置下,各呼吸机品牌的呼吸机外加R(E)存在显著差异。在大多数测试条件下,Babylog 8000plus始终具有最低的呼吸机外加R(E)。在任何测试条件下,任何呼吸机品牌均未出现内源性PEEP(>1 cm H₂O)。在模拟自主呼吸期间,各呼吸机品牌之间的外加呼气WOB也无显著差异。
R(E)的主要原因似乎是呼吸机呼气阀。在吸气和呼气期间使用设定恒定流量的新生儿呼吸机似乎比在呼气期间使用可变偏流的呼吸机具有更低的R(E)。需要进行临床研究以确定这些呼吸机设计的外加R(E)是否会影响气体交换、肺力学或呼吸机撤机。