Suppr超能文献

新西兰老年人死亡率方面的种族不平等现象。

Ethnic inequalities in mortality among the elderly in New Zealand.

作者信息

Jatrana Santosh, Blakely Tony

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008 Oct;32(5):437-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00276.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore the contributions of socio-economic and demographic factors to ethnic disparity among older adult (65+) all cause and cause-specific mortality differentials among Māori, Pacific, Asians and non-Māori, non-Pacific non-Asian (nMnPnA) in New Zealand.

METHODS

We used univariate and multivariable Poisson regression models on linked New Zealand census and mortality data for older adults (65 years and above) (2001 to 2004, 1.3 million person years) with a comprehensive set of socio-economic indicators (education, income, car access, housing tenure, neighourhood deprivation).

RESULTS

After controlling for the differences in age structure, Māori and Pacific males had a higher relative risk of dying than nMnPnA (RR=1.88 (95% Cl: 1.74, 2.04) and RR=1.75 (95% Cl: 1.54, 1.99) respectively) while Asian males had lower risk of dying (RR=0.66, 95% Cl: 0.57, 0.76). For females, the pattern was similar. The mortality gap between ethnic groups was mediated in part by socio-economic factors. The five socio-economic factors appear to account for greater than 40% of the excess mortality for Māori and Pacific men and about 34% for Māori females and 48% for Pacific females compared to nMnPnA men and nMnPnA women respectively. However, for Asian people, adjusting for socio-economic factors actually increases the relative gaps in mortality compared to nMnPnA by 18% for male and 71% for females.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that clear ethnic mortality gradients persist into old age and the mortality level of most groups was influenced by varying distribution of socio-economic factors. To reduce ethnic differences in old age mortality, inequalities as a result of socio-economic position should be reduced.

摘要

目标

探讨社会经济和人口因素对新西兰毛利人、太平洋岛民、亚洲人以及非毛利、非太平洋岛民、非亚洲人(nMnPnA)65岁及以上老年人全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率差异中种族差异的影响。

方法

我们对2001年至2004年(130万人年)65岁及以上老年人的新西兰人口普查数据和死亡率数据进行关联分析,使用单变量和多变量泊松回归模型,并纳入一系列全面的社会经济指标(教育程度、收入、汽车拥有情况、住房 tenure、邻里贫困程度)。

结果

在控制年龄结构差异后,毛利人和太平洋岛民男性的死亡相对风险高于nMnPnA(相对风险分别为RR = 1.88(95%可信区间:1.74, 2.04)和RR = 1.75(95%可信区间:1.54, 1.99)),而亚洲男性的死亡风险较低(RR = 0.66,95%可信区间:0.57, 0.76)。女性的情况类似。种族群体之间的死亡率差距部分由社会经济因素介导。与nMnPnA男性和女性相比,这五个社会经济因素似乎分别占毛利人和太平洋岛民男性额外死亡率的40%以上,毛利女性额外死亡率的约34%以及太平洋岛民女性额外死亡率的48%。然而,对于亚洲人,调整社会经济因素后,与nMnPnA相比,男性死亡率的相对差距实际上增加了18%,女性增加了71%。

结论

结果表明,明显的种族死亡率梯度在老年期依然存在,大多数群体的死亡率水平受到社会经济因素不同分布的影响。为了减少老年死亡率的种族差异,应减少社会经济地位造成的不平等。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验