Suppr超能文献

2001-2013 年全国范围内的死亡率、种族和出生地:一项回顾性队列研究(苏格兰健康和种族关联研究)。

Mortality, ethnicity, and country of birth on a national scale, 2001-2013: A retrospective cohort (Scottish Health and Ethnicity Linkage Study).

机构信息

Edinburgh Migration, Ethnicity and Health Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Environmental & Occupational Medicine, Section of Population Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 1;15(3):e1002515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002515. eCollection 2018 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Migrant and ethnic minority groups are often assumed to have poor health relative to the majority population. Few countries have the capacity to study a key indicator, mortality, by ethnicity and country of birth. We hypothesized at least 10% differences in mortality by ethnic group in Scotland that would not be wholly attenuated by adjustment for socio-economic factors or country of birth.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We linked the Scottish 2001 Census to mortality data (2001-2013) in 4.62 million people (91% of estimated population), calculating age-adjusted mortality rate ratios (RRs; multiplied by 100 as percentages) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for 13 ethnic groups, with the White Scottish group as reference (ethnic group classification follows the Scottish 2001 Census). The Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation, education status, and household tenure were socio-economic status (SES) confounding variables and born in the UK or Republic of Ireland (UK/RoI) an interacting and confounding variable. Smoking and diabetes data were from a primary care sub-sample (about 53,000 people). Males and females in most minority groups had lower age-adjusted mortality RRs than the White Scottish group. The 95% CIs provided good evidence that the RR was more than 10% lower in the following ethnic groups: Other White British (72.3 [95% CI 64.2, 81.3] in males and 75.2 [68.0, 83.2] in females); Other White (80.8 [72.8, 89.8] in males and 76.2 [68.6, 84.7] in females); Indian (62.6 [51.6, 76.0] in males and 60.7 [50.4, 73.1] in females); Pakistani (66.1 [57.4, 76.2] in males and 73.8 [63.7, 85.5] in females); Bangladeshi males (50.7 [32.5, 79.1]); Caribbean females (57.5 [38.5, 85.9]); and Chinese (52.2 [43.7, 62.5] in males and 65.8 [55.3, 78.2] in females). The differences were diminished but not eliminated after adjusting for UK/RoI birth and SES variables. A mortality advantage was evident in all 12 minority groups for those born abroad, but in only 6/12 male groups and 5/12 female groups of those born in the UK/RoI. In the primary care sub-sample, after adjustment for age, UK/RoI born, SES, smoking, and diabetes, the RR was not lower in Indian males (114.7 [95% CI 78.3, 167.9]) and Pakistani females (103.9 [73.9, 145.9]) than in White Scottish males and females, respectively. The main limitations were the inability to include deaths abroad and the small number of deaths in some ethnic minority groups, especially for people born in the UK/RoI.

CONCLUSIONS

There was relatively low mortality for many ethnic minority groups compared to the White Scottish majority. The mortality advantage was less clear in UK/RoI-born minority group offspring than in immigrants. These differences need explaining, and health-related behaviours seem important. Similar analyses are required internationally to fulfil agreed goals for monitoring, understanding, and improving health in ethnically diverse societies and to apply to health policy, especially on health inequalities and inequities.

摘要

背景

与多数人群相比,移民和少数族裔群体的健康状况往往被认为较差。很少有国家有能力通过族裔和出生地来研究死亡率这一关键指标。我们假设在苏格兰,至少有 10%的死亡率差异是由族裔群体造成的,这些差异不会完全因社会经济因素或出生地的调整而减弱。

方法和发现

我们将苏格兰 2001 年的人口普查数据与 462 万人(估计人口的 91%)的死亡率数据进行了关联(2001-2013 年),计算了 13 个族裔群体的年龄调整死亡率比率(RR;乘以 100 作为百分比),并计算了 95%置信区间(CI),以白苏格兰族裔群体为参考(族裔群体分类遵循苏格兰 2001 年的人口普查)。苏格兰多重剥夺指数、教育状况和家庭状况是社会经济地位(SES)的混杂变量,而在英国或爱尔兰共和国出生(UK/RoI)是一个相互混杂的变量。吸烟和糖尿病数据来自初级保健子样本(约 53000 人)。大多数少数族裔群体的男性和女性的年龄调整死亡率 RR 都低于白苏格兰族裔群体。95%CI 提供了充分的证据,表明以下族裔群体的 RR 下降超过 10%:其他白种英国人(男性 72.3 [95%CI 64.2, 81.3],女性 75.2 [68.0, 83.2]);其他白人(男性 80.8 [72.8, 89.8],女性 76.2 [68.6, 84.7]);印度人(男性 62.6 [51.6, 76.0],女性 60.7 [50.4, 73.1]);巴基斯坦人(男性 66.1 [57.4, 76.2],女性 73.8 [63.7, 85.5]);孟加拉国男性(男性 50.7 [32.5, 79.1]);加勒比女性(女性 57.5 [38.5, 85.9]);和中国人(男性 52.2 [43.7, 62.5],女性 65.8 [55.3, 78.2])。在调整了 UK/RoI 出生和 SES 变量后,这些差异虽然有所缩小,但并未消除。对于在国外出生的所有 12 个少数族裔群体,都存在明显的死亡率优势,但在 UK/RoI 出生的男性群体中只有 6/12 个和女性群体中只有 5/12 个。在初级保健子样本中,在调整了年龄、UK/RoI 出生、SES、吸烟和糖尿病后,印度男性(114.7 [95%CI 78.3, 167.9])和巴基斯坦女性(103.9 [73.9, 145.9])的 RR 并不低于白苏格兰男性和女性,分别。主要限制是无法包括在国外死亡的人数和某些少数族裔群体的死亡人数很少,特别是在 UK/RoI 出生的人群中。

结论

与白苏格兰多数人群相比,许多少数族裔群体的死亡率相对较低。在 UK/RoI 出生的少数族裔群体后代中,死亡率优势不如移民明显。这些差异需要解释,健康相关行为似乎很重要。需要在国际上进行类似的分析,以实现监测、理解和改善种族多样化社会健康的既定目标,并将其应用于健康政策,特别是在健康不平等和不公平方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce4c/5832197/45e3e8c8fb5d/pmed.1002515.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验