Suppr超能文献

按种族和贫困程度对新西兰人口进行的交叉分类:1996年至2006年的趋势

Cross classification of the New Zealand population by ethnicity and deprivation: trends from 1996 to 2006.

作者信息

Tobias Martin, Bhattacharya Aloka, White Paul

机构信息

Health and Disability Intelligence, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008 Oct;32(5):431-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00275.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe trends in the distribution of New Zealand's major ethnic groups by small area deprivation and trends in the ethnic composition of each deprivation category.

METHODS

Data sources were the 1996, 2001 and 2006 New Zealand Census of Population and Dwellings. Ethnicity (Māori, Pacific, Asian or European/Other) was defined using total response output. Each person was assigned a deprivation score by geocoding their usual residence (as recorded in the census) to meshblock level. For each time period (1996, 2001 and 2006) the deprivation score for each meshblock was calculated by principal components analysis from nine socio-economic variables included in the corresponding census (the New Zealand Index of Deprivation).

RESULTS

Throughout the observation period, Māori and Pacific ethnic groups were over-represented at the more deprived and under-represented at the less deprived end of the deprivation spectrum. The European ethnic group displayed less-marked skewing, and in the opposite direction, while the Asian ethnic group showed close to the expected uniform distribution. Neither the deprivation distribution of any ethnic group, nor the ethnic composition of any deprivation decile, showed any statistically significant change over the 10-year observation period.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring trends in the relative deprivation distributions of the ethnic groups helps assess progress towards social justice. Similarly, monitoring trends in the ethnic compositions of the different deprivation deciles is important in the formulation of social policy. Little change was found in either of these distributions over the relatively short observation period.

摘要

目的

描述新西兰主要族群在小区域贫困程度方面的分布趋势,以及各贫困类别中的族群构成趋势。

方法

数据来源为1996年、2001年和2006年新西兰人口与住房普查。族群(毛利族、太平洋族裔、亚裔或欧洲裔/其他)根据总回答结果来定义。通过将每个人的常住地址(如普查中所记录)地理编码到街区级别,为每个人赋予一个贫困分数。对于每个时间段(1996年、2001年和2006年),每个街区的贫困分数通过对相应普查中包含的九个社会经济变量(新西兰贫困指数)进行主成分分析来计算。

结果

在整个观察期内,毛利族和太平洋族裔在贫困程度较高的区域中占比过高,而在贫困程度较低的区域中占比过低。欧洲族裔的分布偏差较小,且方向相反,而亚裔族裔的分布接近预期的均匀分布。在为期10年的观察期内,任何族群的贫困分布以及任何贫困十分位数的族群构成均未显示出任何具有统计学意义的变化。

结论

监测各民族相对贫困分布的趋势有助于评估社会正义方面的进展。同样,监测不同贫困十分位数的族群构成趋势对于社会政策的制定也很重要。在相对较短的观察期内,这两种分布均未发现明显变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验