Suppr超能文献

损伤与创伤护理交付模式变革的时机:创伤死亡回顾分析

Time for a change in injury and trauma care delivery: a trauma death review analysis.

作者信息

Sugrue Michael, Caldwell Erica, D'Amours Scott, Crozier John, Wyllie Peter, Flabouris Arthas, Sheridan Mark, Jalaludin Bin

机构信息

Department of Trauma, Evidence Management and Surveillance Liverpool Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2008 Nov;78(11):949-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04711.x.

Abstract

Safety and error reduction in medical care is crucial to the future of medicine. This study evaluates trauma patients dying at a level 1 trauma centre to determine the adequacy of care. All trauma deaths at a level 1 trauma centre between 1996 and 2003 were reviewed by an eight-member multidisciplinary death review panel. Errors in care were classified according to their location, nature, impact, outcome and whether the deaths were avoidable or non-avoidable. Avoidable deaths were categorized as potentially, probably and definitely avoidable. Between 1996 and 2003, there were 17 157 trauma admissions, including 307 trauma deaths. The mean patient age was 47.7 years +/- 24.8 years, mean injury severity score 38.1 +/- 19.6. Of all deaths, 69 (22.5%) were deemed avoidable. Of the avoidable deaths, 61 (88%) were potentially avoidable, 7 (10%) probably avoidable and 1 (1.4%) definitely avoidable. Avoidable deaths were associated with patients with increased age, lower injury severity score, admissions to intensive care unit, longer hospital stay and treatment by a non-trauma surgeon (P < 0.05). Of the 307 trauma deaths, 271 (89.3%) patients experienced a total of 1063 errors, an overall error rate of 3.5 per patient. The error rate in the non-avoidable group was 2.9 per patient and 5.3 per patient in the avoidable group (P < 0.0001). Most errors occurred in the resuscitation area. Age, severity of injury, hospital length of stay and care by a non-trauma surgeon are factors associated with avoidable deaths. A new approach to trauma and injury care is required.

摘要

医疗保健中的安全与减少差错对医学的未来至关重要。本研究评估在一级创伤中心死亡的创伤患者,以确定护理的充分性。一个由八名成员组成的多学科死亡审查小组对1996年至2003年期间一级创伤中心的所有创伤死亡病例进行了审查。护理差错根据其发生地点、性质、影响、结果以及死亡是否可避免进行分类。可避免的死亡分为潜在可避免、可能可避免和肯定可避免。1996年至2003年期间,共有17157例创伤入院病例,其中包括307例创伤死亡病例。患者平均年龄为47.7岁±24.8岁,平均损伤严重程度评分为38.1±19.6。在所有死亡病例中,69例(22.5%)被认为是可避免的。在可避免的死亡病例中,61例(88%)为潜在可避免,7例(10%)可能可避免,1例(1.4%)肯定可避免。可避免的死亡与年龄较大、损伤严重程度评分较低、入住重症监护病房、住院时间较长以及由非创伤外科医生治疗的患者相关(P<0.05)。在307例创伤死亡病例中,271例(89.3%)患者共出现1063例差错,总体差错率为每位患者3.5例。不可避免组的差错率为每位患者2.9例,可避免组为每位患者5.3例(P<0.0001)。大多数差错发生在复苏区域。年龄、损伤严重程度、住院时间和由非创伤外科医生进行的护理是与可避免死亡相关的因素。需要一种新的创伤和损伤护理方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验