Suppr超能文献

催化吸附溶出伏安法与电热原子吸收光谱法测定人尿中痕量钴和铬的比较

Catalytic adsorptive stripping voltammetry versus electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry in the determination of trace cobalt and chromium in human urine.

作者信息

Husáková L, Bobrowski A, Srámková J, Królicka A, Vytras K

机构信息

Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, namesti Cs. legii 565, CZ-53210 Pardubice, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Talanta. 2005 May 15;66(4):999-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2005.01.003.

Abstract

Two methods of the determination of cobalt and chromium in human urine of non-occupationally exposed populations-highly sensitive catalytic adsorptive stripping voltammetry (CAdSV) and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ET-AAS)-are evaluated and compared. The CAdSV methods are based on adsorptive accumulation of a cobalt-nioxime (1,2-cyclohexanedione dioxime) or a chromium-DTPA (diethylenetriammine-N,N,N',N'',N''-pentaacetic acid) complexes on a hanging mercury drop electrode, followed by a stripping voltammetric measurement of the catalytic reduction current of the adsorbed complex in the presence of sodium nitrite in case of cobalt or in the presence of sodium nitrate in case of chromium determination. In the CAdSV procedure UV-photolysis was used for the sample pre-treatment; the ET-AAS determination did not require any separate preliminary decomposition of the analyte urine samples. The accuracy of the procedures was checked by the analysis of commercially available quality control urine samples. The detection limits (3sigma) were 0.13mugl(-1) for Co and 0.18mugl(-1) for Cr in ET-AAS determination and 0.007mugl(-1) for Co and 0.002mugl(-1) for Cr in CAdSV measurements. Precision (R.S.D.) was less than 5% for both methods. The study has shown that the CAdSV is a more reliable and sensitive technique for the determination of very low cobalt and chromium contents in urine, the detection of which is not possible when using the AAS technique.

摘要

对非职业暴露人群人尿中钴和铬的两种测定方法——高灵敏度催化吸附溶出伏安法(CAdSV)和电热原子吸收光谱法(ET - AAS)进行了评估和比较。CAdSV方法基于钴 - 镍肟(1,2 - 环己二酮二肟)或铬 - DTPA(二乙三胺 - N,N,N',N'',N'' - 五乙酸)络合物在悬汞滴电极上的吸附积累,随后在测定钴时于亚硝酸钠存在下或测定铬时于硝酸钠存在下对吸附络合物的催化还原电流进行溶出伏安测量。在CAdSV程序中,采用紫外光解进行样品预处理;ET - AAS测定不需要对分析物尿液样品进行任何单独的初步分解。通过分析市售质量控制尿液样品来检查程序的准确性。ET - AAS测定中钴的检测限(3σ)为0.13μg l⁻¹,铬为0.18μg l⁻¹;CAdSV测量中钴为0.007μg l⁻¹,铬为0.002μg l⁻¹。两种方法的精密度(相对标准偏差)均小于5%。研究表明,CAdSV是一种更可靠、灵敏的技术,用于测定尿液中极低含量的钴和铬,而使用原子吸收光谱法(AAS)技术则无法检测到这些含量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验