Bell J
Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):e23. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024752.
Research funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research, NNF 80045, States of Mind: Emerging Issues in Neuroethics. While there are those who object to the prospective use of propranolol to prevent or treat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), most obstreperous among them the President's Council on Bioethics, the use of propranolol can be justified for patients with severe PTSD. Propranolol, if effective, will alter the quality of certain memories in the brain. But this is not a serious threat to the self understood in terms of narrative identity. A narrative identity framework acknowledges that memory is always being subtly altered or modified. For severe cases of PTSD propranolol may help victims who don't respond to any other therapy or therapy combination regain their authentic self-narrative and engage once more in life activities. For those whose symptoms are not so severe the potential risks and side-effects of the drug may outweigh the benefits. Patients and family members should be allowed to decide, in consultation with their physician, whether this drug is appropriate in their case.
由加拿大卫生研究院资助的研究项目,编号为NNF 80045,“心理状态:神经伦理学中的新问题”。虽然有人反对将普萘洛尔前瞻性地用于预防或治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),其中最喧嚣的当属总统生物伦理委员会,但对于重度PTSD患者而言,使用普萘洛尔是合理的。如果普萘洛尔有效,它将改变大脑中某些记忆的性质。但这对于基于叙事身份理解的自我来说并非严重威胁。叙事身份框架承认记忆总是在被微妙地改变或修正。对于重度PTSD患者,普萘洛尔可能会帮助那些对任何其他治疗方法或治疗组合均无反应的受害者重新找回真实的自我叙事,并再次参与生活活动。对于症状不那么严重的患者,该药物的潜在风险和副作用可能超过其益处。应允许患者及其家属在与医生协商后决定该药物是否适用于他们的情况。