Suppr超能文献

普萘洛尔与创伤后应激障碍的预防:抹去痛苦记忆的“刺痛”是否错误?

Propranolol and the prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder: is it wrong to erase the "sting" of bad memories?

作者信息

Henry Michael, Fishman Jennifer R, Youngner Stuart J

机构信息

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-4976, USA.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2007 Sep;7(9):12-20. doi: 10.1080/15265160701518474.

Abstract

The National Institute of Mental Health (Bethesda, MD) reports that approximately 5.2 million Americans experience post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) each year. PTSD can be severely debilitating and diminish quality of life for patients and those who care for them. Studies have indicated that propranolol, a beta-blocker, reduces consolidation of emotional memory. When administered immediately after a psychic trauma, it is efficacious as a prophylactic for PTSD. Use of such memory-altering drugs raises important ethical concerns, including some futuristic dystopias put forth by the President's Council on Bioethics. We think that adequate informed consent should facilitate ethical research using propranolol and, if it proves efficacious, routine treatment. Clinical evidence from studies should certainly continue to evaluate realistic concerns about possible ill effects of diminishing memory. If memory-attenuating drugs prove effective, we believe that the most immediate social concern is the over-medicalization of bad memories, and its subsequent exploitation by the pharmaceutical industry.

摘要

美国国立精神卫生研究所(位于马里兰州贝塞斯达)报告称,每年约有520万美国人患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。创伤后应激障碍会严重削弱患者及照顾他们的人的生活质量。研究表明,β受体阻滞剂普萘洛尔可减少情感记忆的巩固。在精神创伤后立即服用,它作为创伤后应激障碍的预防药物是有效的。使用这类改变记忆的药物引发了重要的伦理问题,包括总统生物伦理委员会提出的一些未来反乌托邦设想。我们认为,充分的知情同意应有助于使用普萘洛尔进行伦理研究,如果证明其有效,也有助于其常规治疗。研究的临床证据当然应继续评估对记忆减退可能产生的不良影响的现实担忧。如果记忆减退药物被证明有效,我们认为最直接的社会问题是对不良记忆的过度医学化,以及制药行业随后对其的利用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验