• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冷冻胚胎、遗传信息与生殖权利。

Frozen embryos, genetic information and reproductive rights.

作者信息

Chan Sarah, Quigley Muireann

机构信息

Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2007 Oct;21(8):439-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00581.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00581.x
PMID:17845450
Abstract

Recent ethical and legal challenges have arisen concerning the rights of individuals over their IVF embryos, leading to questions about how, when the wishes of parents regarding their embryos conflict, such situations ought to be resolved. A notion commonly invoked in relation to frozen embryo disputes is that of reproductive rights: a right to have (or not to have) children. This has sometimes been interpreted to mean a right to have, or not to have, one's own genetic children. But can such rights legitimately be asserted to give rise to claims over embryos? We examine the question of property in genetic material as applied to gametes and embryos, and whether rights over genetic information extend to grant control over IVF embryos. In particular we consider the purported right not to have one's own genetically related children from a property-based perspective. We argue that even if we concede that such (property) rights do exist, those rights become limited in scope and application upon engaging in reproduction. We want to show that once an IVF embryo is created for the purpose of reproduction, any right not to have genetically-related children that may be based in property rights over genetic information is ceded. There is thus no right to prevent one's IVF embryos from being brought to birth on the basis of a right to avoid having one's own genetic children. Although there may be reproductive rights over gametes and embryos, these are not grounded in genetic information.

摘要

近期,围绕个人对其体外受精胚胎所享有的权利,出现了一些伦理和法律方面的挑战,这引发了诸多问题,比如当父母对其胚胎的意愿发生冲突时,此类情况应如何解决。在冷冻胚胎纠纷中,常被提及的一个概念是生殖权利:即生育(或不生育)子女的权利。这有时被解释为拥有或不拥有自己亲生孩子的权利。但这种权利能否合理地被主张以产生对胚胎的诉求呢?我们探讨将遗传物质视为财产应用于配子和胚胎的问题,以及对遗传信息的权利是否延伸至赋予对体外受精胚胎的控制权。特别是,我们从基于财产的角度考虑所谓不生育自己亲生孩子的权利。我们认为,即便我们承认此类(财产)权利确实存在,但一旦参与生殖活动,这些权利在范围和应用上就会受到限制。我们想表明,一旦为了生殖目的创造了体外受精胚胎,任何基于对遗传信息的财产权而产生的不生育亲生孩子的权利都将让渡。因此,不存在基于避免生育自己亲生孩子的权利而阻止自己的体外受精胚胎出生的权利。尽管对配子和胚胎可能存在生殖权利,但这些权利并非基于遗传信息。

相似文献

1
Frozen embryos, genetic information and reproductive rights.冷冻胚胎、遗传信息与生殖权利。
Bioethics. 2007 Oct;21(8):439-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00581.x.
2
[Medical, ethical and legal issues in cryopreservation of human embryos].[人类胚胎冷冻保存中的医学、伦理和法律问题]
Rev Med Chil. 2014 Jul;142(7):903-8. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872014000700011.
3
Balancing competing interests over frozen embryos: the judgment of solomon? Evans v. United Kingdom.平衡对冷冻胚胎的相互冲突的利益:所罗门的判决?埃文斯诉联合王国
Med Law Rev. 2006 Autumn;14(3):425-33. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwl015. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
4
Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent".关于冷冻胚胎的争议与“不成为父母的权利”。
Columbia J Gend Law. 2003;12(1):128-53.
5
Cold shoulder treatment: the disposition of frozen embryos post-divorce.
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev. 1999;25(1-2):99-137.
6
Disputes over frozen embryos: who wins, who loses, and how do we decide?--An analysis of Davis v. Davis, York v. Jones, and state statutes affecting reproductive choices.冷冻胚胎之争:谁赢谁输,我们如何裁决?——对戴维斯诉戴维斯案、约克诉琼斯案及影响生殖选择的州法规的分析
Creighton Law Rev. 1991 Jun;24(4):1299-357.
7
Genetic affinity and the right to 'three-parent IVF'.遗传亲缘关系与“三亲 IVF”的权利
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Dec;34(12):1577-1580. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1046-8. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
8
Toward a gender-sensitive assisted reproduction policy.迈向性别敏感的辅助生殖政策。
Bioethics. 2009 Jan;23(1):28-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00676.x.
9
Human oocyte cryopreservation: a valid alternative to embryo cryopreservation?人类卵母细胞冷冻保存:胚胎冷冻保存的有效替代方法?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Apr 5;113 Suppl 1:S24-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.11.006.
10
Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution.
Univ Miami Law Rev. 1992 Jan;46(3):803-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Assisted reproduction: what factors interfere in the professional's decisions? Are single women an issue?辅助生殖:哪些因素干扰了专业人士的决策?单身女性是一个问题吗?
BMC Womens Health. 2011 May 31;11:21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-21.