Schumacher H Ralph, Becker Michael A, Wortmann Robert L, Macdonald Patricia A, Hunt Barbara, Streit Janet, Lademacher Christopher, Joseph-Ridge Nancy
University of Pennsylvania and VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Nov 15;59(11):1540-8. doi: 10.1002/art.24209.
To compare the urate-lowering efficacy and safety of febuxostat, allopurinol, and placebo in a large group of subjects with hyperuricemia and gout, including persons with impaired renal function.
Subjects (n = 1,072) with hyperuricemia (serum urate level > or = 8.0 mg/dl) and gout with normal or impaired (serum creatinine level >1.5 to < or = 2.0 mg/dl) renal function were randomized to receive once-daily febuxostat (80 mg, 120 mg, or 240 mg), allopurinol (300 or 100 mg, based on renal function), or placebo for 28 weeks.
Significantly (P < or = 0.05) higher percentages of subjects treated with febuxostat 80 mg (48%), 120 mg (65%), and 240 mg (69%) attained the primary end point of last 3 monthly serum urate levels <6.0 mg/dl compared with allopurinol (22%) and placebo (0%). A significantly (P < 0.05) higher percentage of subjects with impaired renal function treated with febuxostat 80 mg (4 [44%] of 9), 120 mg (5 [45%] of 11), and 240 mg (3 [60%] of 5) achieved the primary end point compared with those treated with 100 mg of allopurinol (0 [0%] of 10). Proportions of subjects experiencing any adverse event or serious adverse event were similar across groups, although diarrhea and dizziness were more frequent in the febuxostat 240 mg group. The primary reasons for withdrawal were similar across groups except for gout flares, which were more frequent with febuxostat than with allopurinol.
At all doses studied, febuxostat more effectively lowered and maintained serum urate levels <6.0 mg/dl than did allopurinol (300 or 100 mg) or placebo in subjects with hyperuricemia and gout, including those with mild to moderately impaired renal function.
在一大群高尿酸血症和痛风患者(包括肾功能受损者)中比较非布司他、别嘌醇和安慰剂降低尿酸的疗效及安全性。
将1072例高尿酸血症(血清尿酸水平≥8.0mg/dl)且伴有痛风、肾功能正常或受损(血清肌酐水平>1.5至≤2.0mg/dl)的患者随机分组,分别每日一次服用非布司他(80mg、120mg或240mg)、别嘌醇(根据肾功能为300mg或100mg)或安慰剂,为期28周。
与别嘌醇(22%)和安慰剂(0%)相比,服用80mg(48%)、120mg(65%)和240mg(69%)非布司他的患者达到最后3个月血清尿酸水平<6.0mg/dl这一主要终点的比例显著更高(P≤0.05)。与服用100mg别嘌醇的患者(10例中0例[0%])相比,服用80mg(9例中4例[44%])、120mg(11例中5例[45%])和240mg(5例中3例[60%])非布司他的肾功能受损患者达到主要终点的比例显著更高(P<0.05)。各治疗组发生任何不良事件或严重不良事件的比例相似,不过240mg非布司他组腹泻和头晕更为常见。除痛风发作外,各治疗组的撤药主要原因相似,痛风发作在非布司他组比别嘌醇组更频繁。
在所有研究剂量下,对于高尿酸血症和痛风患者(包括轻度至中度肾功能受损者),非布司他在降低并维持血清尿酸水平<6.0mg/dl方面比别嘌醇(300mg或100mg)或安慰剂更有效。