• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成本分摊:一种生硬的手段。

Cost-sharing: a blunt instrument.

作者信息

Remler Dahlia K, Greene Jessica

机构信息

School of Public Affairs, Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, NY, 10010, USA.

出版信息

Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:293-311. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090804.

DOI:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090804
PMID:18976141
Abstract

Cost-sharing is a health care cost-containment technique in which health care services are partially paid for by patients out of pocket. Cost-sharing can reduce non-cost-effective care, but it can also undermine the financial protection and access values of health insurance. We review the empirical evidence published since the mid-1980s about cost-sharing's effect on utilization, expenditures, health, and adverse consequences, including how the effects vary by form of care, by health status, and by sociodemographic characteristics. Some cost-sharing, such as emergency department copayments, reduces utilization without any harmful effects, whereas other cost-sharing reduces valuable care such as maintenance drug use among the chronically ill. Cost-sharing should be used judiciously, with attention taken not to reduce highly cost-effective care.

摘要

费用分担是一种医疗成本控制技术,即患者需自掏腰包支付部分医疗服务费用。费用分担可以减少非成本效益高的医疗服务,但也可能损害医疗保险的财务保护和可及性价值。我们回顾了自20世纪80年代中期以来发表的关于费用分担对医疗服务利用、支出、健康及不良后果影响的实证证据,包括这些影响如何因医疗形式、健康状况和社会人口特征的不同而有所差异。一些费用分担,如急诊科的自付费用,可减少医疗服务利用且无任何有害影响,而其他费用分担则会减少诸如慢性病患者维持用药等有价值的医疗服务。应谨慎使用费用分担,注意不要减少成本效益高的医疗服务。

相似文献

1
Cost-sharing: a blunt instrument.成本分摊:一种生硬的手段。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:293-311. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090804.
2
The direct and indirect effects of cost-sharing on the use of preventive services.费用分担对预防性服务使用的直接和间接影响。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Feb;34(6):1331-50.
3
Microinsurance: innovations in low-cost health insurance.小额保险:低成本健康保险的创新。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Nov-Dec;28(6):1788-98. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.1788.
4
Prescription for patient-centered care and cost containment.以患者为中心的护理与成本控制的处方。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 1;369(5):471-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1306639. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
5
Mental health care and out-of-pocket expenditures in Europe: results from the ESEMeD project.欧洲的精神卫生保健与自付费用:ESEMeD项目的结果
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2011 Jun;14(2):95-105.
6
Do high-deductible health plans threaten quality of care?高免赔额健康保险计划会威胁医疗质量吗?
N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 22;353(12):1202-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058209.
7
Horizontal equity in utilisation of care and fairness of health financing: a comparison of micro-health insurance and user fees in Rwanda.医疗服务利用中的横向公平性与卫生筹资公平性:卢旺达小额医疗保险与使用者付费的比较
Health Econ. 2006 Jan;15(1):19-31. doi: 10.1002/hec.1014.
8
Introduction to value-based insurance design.基于价值的保险设计简介。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Nov;5(11):1118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.06.014.
9
The effects of cost-shifting in the state children's heath insurance program.州儿童健康保险计划中成本转嫁的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Apr;96(4):709-15. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.059758. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
10
American health policy: cracks in the foundation.美国卫生政策:基础出现裂痕。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2007 Oct;32(5):759-83. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2007-029.

引用本文的文献

1
Loss of Subsidized Drug Coverage and Mortality among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的补贴药物覆盖范围丧失与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2025 May 29;392(20):2025-2034. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2414435. Epub 2025 May 14.
2
Examples from US Policies to Reduce Oversupply and Overutilization: Lessons for the Japanese Health Care System.美国减少供应过剩和过度使用政策的实例:对日本医疗体系的启示
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580241310757. doi: 10.1177/00469580241310757.
3
Clustering affordable care act qualified health plans to understand how and where insurance facilitates or impedes access to HIV prevention.
将平价医疗法案合格健康计划进行聚类,以了解保险如何以及在何处促进或阻碍艾滋病毒预防。
AIDS Res Ther. 2024 Nov 19;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12981-024-00674-9.
4
Patient liability, treatment adherence, and treatment persistence associated with state bans of copay accumulator adjustment programs.患者责任、治疗依从性和治疗持久性与各州禁止共付额累加调整计划有关。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Sep;30(9):909-916. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.9.909.
5
Mandatory Documented Consent and Cost-Sharing Impede Access to Collaborative Care Psychiatry.强制的书面同意书和费用分摊阻碍了协同护理精神病学的实施。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Dec;38(16):3616-3617. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08394-y. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
6
Unintended consequences of healthcare reform in South Korea: evidence from a regression discontinuity in time design.韩国医疗改革的意外后果:来自时间上回归不连续设计的证据。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jun 22;21(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00993-9.
7
Real price of health-experiences of out-of-pocket costs in Australia: protocol for a systematic review.健康的真实代价——澳大利亚自付费用的经验:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 20;12(12):e065932. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065932.
8
Factors Associated with Willingness to Pay for Cost-Sharing under Universal Health Coverage Scheme in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Survey.印度尼西亚日惹实施全民健康覆盖计划下对费用分担的支付意愿及影响因素的横断面调查
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 15;19(22):15017. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215017.
9
Understanding patient and physician responses to various cost-sharing programs for prescription drugs in South Korea: A multilevel analysis.理解韩国各种处方药共付计划对患者和医生的反应:多层次分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 31;10:924992. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.924992. eCollection 2022.
10
A systematic umbrella review of the association of prescription drug insurance and cost-sharing with drug use, health services use, and health.系统综述 umbrella review 处方药保险与费用分担与药物使用、卫生服务使用和健康的关联。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07554-w.