• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解韩国各种处方药共付计划对患者和医生的反应:多层次分析。

Understanding patient and physician responses to various cost-sharing programs for prescription drugs in South Korea: A multilevel analysis.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Hanyang University, Ansan-si, South Korea.

School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si, South Korea.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 31;10:924992. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.924992. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.924992
PMID:36117604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9471326/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient and/or physician responses are a pivotal issue in designing rational cost-sharing programs under health insurance systems.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to understand patient and/or physician responses to cost-sharing programs designed for prescription drugs in South Korea.

METHODS

As a framework, we took advantage of a tiered cost-sharing program, including from copayment to coinsurance (threshold 1) and reduced coinsurance (threshold 2). Given the hierarchical structure of prescriptions nested within patients, we utilized a multilevel analysis to assess effects of various cost-sharing programs on patient and/or physician responses using National Health Insurance claims data from 2018.

RESULTS

We found that a tiered cost-sharing program was effective in changing the behaviors of patients and/or physicians. Threshold 1 was found to be more effective than threshold 2 in changing their behaviors. At the prescription level, sensitivity to cost-sharing programs was associated with prescribed days of treatment and locations of prescription. In a similar vein, sensitivity to cost-sharing programs was associated with gender and age group of patients.

CONCLUSION

A simplified cost-sharing program with extended intervals should be considered to rationalize cost-sharing programs. Specifically, a cost-sharing program designed for long-term prescriptions for chronic diseases together with an emphasis on cost transparency is required to better guide price-conscious decisions by patients and/or physicians.

摘要

简介

在医疗保险制度下,设计合理的费用分担计划,患者和/或医生的反应是一个关键问题。

目的

本研究旨在了解韩国为处方药物设计的费用分担计划中患者和/或医生的反应。

方法

作为一个框架,我们利用了分层费用分担计划,包括从共付额到按比例分担(阈值 1)和降低按比例分担(阈值 2)。鉴于处方在患者内嵌套的层次结构,我们利用多层次分析,使用 2018 年国家健康保险索赔数据评估各种费用分担计划对患者和/或医生反应的影响。

结果

我们发现,分层费用分担计划能够有效地改变患者和/或医生的行为。与阈值 2 相比,阈值 1 更能改变他们的行为。在处方层面,对费用分担计划的敏感性与治疗天数和处方地点有关。同样,对费用分担计划的敏感性与患者的性别和年龄组有关。

结论

应考虑简化费用分担计划并延长间隔,以合理化费用分担计划。具体来说,需要为慢性病的长期处方设计一种费用分担计划,并强调成本透明度,以更好地引导患者和/或医生做出有价格意识的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae55/9471326/356cc811c134/fpubh-10-924992-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae55/9471326/8854afd8f509/fpubh-10-924992-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae55/9471326/356cc811c134/fpubh-10-924992-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae55/9471326/8854afd8f509/fpubh-10-924992-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae55/9471326/356cc811c134/fpubh-10-924992-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding patient and physician responses to various cost-sharing programs for prescription drugs in South Korea: A multilevel analysis.理解韩国各种处方药共付计划对患者和医生的反应:多层次分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 31;10:924992. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.924992. eCollection 2022.
2
Assessing the effect of Taiwan's outpatient prescription drug copayment policy in the elderly.评估台湾门诊处方药共付政策对老年人的影响。
Med Care. 2003 Dec;41(12):1331-42. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000100579.91550.C4.
3
Physician and Patient Adjustment to Reference Pricing for Drugs.医生和患者对药品参考定价的调整。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920544. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20544.
4
The impact of differential cost sharing of prescription drugs on the use of primary care clinics among patients with hypertension or diabetes.不同处方药费用分担对高血压或糖尿病患者使用基层医疗诊所的影响。
Public Health. 2019 Aug;173:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
5
The impact of cost sharing of prescription drug expenditures on health care utilization by the elderly: own- and cross-price elasticities.处方药支出费用分担对老年人医疗保健利用的影响:自价格弹性和交叉价格弹性
Health Policy. 2007 Aug;82(3):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
6
Changes in drug utilization following the outpatient prescription drug cost-sharing program--evidence from Taiwan's elderly.门诊处方药费用分担计划实施后药物使用情况的变化——来自台湾老年人的证据
Health Policy. 2004 Jun;68(3):277-87. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.013.
7
Physician gender and changes in drug prescribing after the implementation of reference pricing in British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省实施参考定价后医生性别与药物处方的变化
Clin Ther. 2003 Jan;25(1):273-84. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)90037-3.
8
Prediction of Change in Prescription Ingredient Costs and Co-payment Rates under a Reference Pricing System in South Korea.韩国参考定价系统下处方成分成本和共付率变化的预测
Value Health Reg Issues. 2017 May;12:7-19. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2016.07.011. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
9
Who Benefits from the Fixed Copayment of Medical and Pharmaceutical Expenditure among the Korean Elderly?谁从韩国老年人的医疗和药品支出固定共付制中受益?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 3;17(21):8118. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218118.
10
The Effect of Changes in Cost Sharing on the Consumption of Prescription and Over-the-Counter Medicines in Catalonia.成本分担变化对加泰罗尼亚地区处方药和非处方药消费的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 4;18(5):2562. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052562.

引用本文的文献

1
Which factor reduces pharmaceutical expenditure, number of entrants or price variance? Updated generic drug markets in South Korea.是哪个因素降低了药品支出,是进入市场的企业数量还是价格差异?韩国更新后的仿制药市场。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Aug 14;14(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00545-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Importance of a usual source of care in choosing low-priced generic drugs: a cross-sectional study.选择低价仿制药时通常就诊机构的重要性:一项横断面研究。
Fam Pract. 2022 Sep 24;39(5):791-798. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab172.
2
Cost sharing and the demand for health services in a regulated market.在有管制的市场中,费用分担与卫生服务需求。
Health Econ. 2021 Jun;30(6):1259-1275. doi: 10.1002/hec.4244. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
3
Policy Recommendations for Pharmacy Benefit Managers to Stem the Escalating Costs of Prescription Drugs: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians.
《药剂福利管理人员控制处方药成本不断上涨的政策建议:美国医师学会立场文件》。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 3;171(11):823-824. doi: 10.7326/M19-0035. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
4
The impact of differential cost sharing of prescription drugs on the use of primary care clinics among patients with hypertension or diabetes.不同处方药费用分担对高血压或糖尿病患者使用基层医疗诊所的影响。
Public Health. 2019 Aug;173:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
5
National Health Expenditure Projections, 2018-27: Economic And Demographic Trends Drive Spending And Enrollment Growth.2018-2027 年全国卫生支出预测:经济和人口趋势推动支出和参保人数增长。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):491-501. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05499. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
6
The effect of cost-sharing design characteristics on use of health care recommended by the treating physician; a discrete choice experiment.费用分担设计特征对治疗医生推荐的医疗保健使用的影响;一项离散选择实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3598-4.
7
Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.美国和其他高收入国家的医疗保健支出。
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150.
8
High-Deductible Health Plans Reduce Health Care Cost And Utilization, Including Use Of Needed Preventive Services.高免赔额健康计划可降低医疗保健成本和利用率,包括对必要预防服务的使用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Oct 1;36(10):1762-1768. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0610.
9
The effect of increasing the coinsurance rate on outpatient utilization of healthcare services in South Korea.提高韩国医疗保险自付率对门诊医疗服务利用的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2076-8.
10
How Low-Income Subsidy Recipients Respond to Medicare Part D Cost Sharing.低收入补贴领取者对医疗保险D部分费用分担的反应。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun;52(3):1185-1206. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12520. Epub 2016 Jun 20.