• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰腺癌患者肿瘤反应评估中的差异:世界卫生组织(WHO)标准与实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)的对比

Discrepancy in the assessment of tumor response in patients with pancreatic cancer: WHO versus RECIST criteria.

作者信息

Ahn S H, Garewal H S, Dragovich T

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology-Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.

出版信息

J BUON. 2008 Jul-Sep;13(3):359-62.

PMID:18979550
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) have largely replaced the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria as a preferred method for assessing tumor response in clinical trials. We hypothesized that due to frequent asymmetric growth pattern, as well as somewhat diffuse margins of pancreatic cancer, the use of WHO vs. RECIST criteria may result in significantly different tumor response assessments. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the WHO (bidimensional) to RECIST (unidimensional) in assessing treatment response in pancreatic cancer patients enrolled in clinical trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have evaluated the contrast- enhanced computed tomography (CT) images from 12 pancreatic cancer patients with measurable disease enrolled in two phase I/II clinical trials at the Arizona Cancer Center, between July 2000 and July 2003. The tumor measurements were re-calculated by RECIST and WHO criteria and were compared.

RESULTS

In 3 out of the 12 patients (25%) there was discordant response categorization when WHO criteria were used instead of RECIST. Clinical presentations in all 3 patients were more consistent with WHO categorization.

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective data analysis suggests that use of different tumor response criteria (RECIST vs. WHO) may result in different assessments of treatment efficacy in patients with pancreatic cancer on clinical trials. This finding warrants further confirmation in a larger prospectively designed trial.

摘要

目的

实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)已在很大程度上取代了世界卫生组织(WHO)的标准,成为临床试验中评估肿瘤反应的首选方法。我们推测,由于胰腺癌常见的不对称生长模式以及其边界略显弥散,使用WHO标准与RECIST标准可能会导致肿瘤反应评估结果存在显著差异。这项回顾性研究的目的是比较WHO(二维)与RECIST(一维)标准在评估参加临床试验的胰腺癌患者治疗反应中的差异。

材料与方法

我们评估了2000年7月至2003年7月期间在亚利桑那癌症中心参加两项I/II期临床试验的12例患有可测量病灶的胰腺癌患者的增强计算机断层扫描(CT)图像。按照RECIST和WHO标准重新计算肿瘤测量值并进行比较。

结果

12例患者中有3例(25%)在使用WHO标准而非RECIST标准时出现了反应分类不一致的情况。所有3例患者的临床表现与WHO分类更为一致。

结论

我们的回顾性数据分析表明,在临床试验中,使用不同的肿瘤反应标准(RECIST与WHO)可能会导致对胰腺癌患者治疗疗效的评估结果不同。这一发现有待在更大规模的前瞻性设计试验中进一步证实。

相似文献

1
Discrepancy in the assessment of tumor response in patients with pancreatic cancer: WHO versus RECIST criteria.胰腺癌患者肿瘤反应评估中的差异:世界卫生组织(WHO)标准与实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)的对比
J BUON. 2008 Jul-Sep;13(3):359-62.
2
A statistical simulation study finds discordance between WHO criteria and RECIST guideline.一项统计模拟研究发现,世界卫生组织(WHO)标准与实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)指南之间存在不一致。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Apr;57(4):358-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.07.015.
3
Measuring response in solid tumors: comparison of RECIST and WHO response criteria.实体瘤反应的测量:RECIST与WHO反应标准的比较。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct;33(10):533-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyg093.
4
Morphological analysis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma on multidetector row computed tomography: implications for treatment response evaluation.多排螺旋 CT 对胰腺腺癌形态学分析:对治疗反应评估的影响。
Pancreas. 2009 Oct;38(7):799-803. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181ac7511.
5
Measurement of response of pulmonal tumors in 64-slice MDCT.64层螺旋CT对肺部肿瘤反应的测量
Acta Radiol. 2010 Jun;51(5):512-21. doi: 10.3109/02841851003674520.
6
Inadequacy of the RECIST criteria for response evaluation in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)在恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者疗效评估中的不足。
Lung Cancer. 2004 Jan;43(1):63-9. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(03)00292-7.
7
Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the response evaluation of cancer therapy according to RECIST and WHO-criteria.根据 RECIST 和 WHO 标准,癌症治疗反应评估中的观察者间和观察者内变异性。
Acta Oncol. 2010 May;49(4):509-14. doi: 10.3109/02841861003705794.
8
Tumor response evaluation in oncology: current update.肿瘤学中的肿瘤反应评估:当前进展
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010 Jul;34(4):479-84. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181db2670.
9
Radiological measurement of breast cancer metastases to lung and liver: comparison between WHO (bidimensional) and RECIST (unidimensional) guidelines.乳腺癌肺和肝转移的放射学测量:WHO(二维)和RECIST(一维)指南的比较
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003 May-Jun;27(3):380-4. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200305000-00014.
10
Assessment of objective responses in thymic epithelial tumors using ITMIG modified criteria.使用国际胸腺恶性肿瘤研究组(ITMIG)修订标准评估胸腺上皮肿瘤的客观缓解情况。
Lung Cancer. 2016 Jun;96:48-51. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Locally advanced gastric cancer: total iodine uptake to predict the response of primary lesion to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.局部进展期胃癌:总碘摄取量预测新辅助化疗对原发病灶的反应。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;144(11):2207-2218. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2728-z. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
2
Weekly paclitaxel as metronomic palliative chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer.每周一次紫杉醇作为小细胞肺癌的节拍式姑息化疗
South Asian J Cancer. 2016 Apr-Jun;5(2):67-9. doi: 10.4103/2278-330X.181643.