Doorenbos Ardith Z, Berger Ann M, Brohard-Holbert Cheryl, Eaton Linda, Kozachik Sharon, LoBiondo-Wood Geri, Mallory Gail, Rue Tessa, Varricchio Claudette
The School of Nursing, The University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2008 Nov;35(6):E100-7. doi: 10.1188/08.onf.e100-e107.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To determine the priorities of oncology nursing research, including the effect of evidence-based practice resources as identified by the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) membership in June 2008.
Descriptive, cross-sectional.
A Web-based survey of ONS members.
Stratified into three groups: a representative random sample of the general membership (n = 4,460, 421 responded), an over-sampled random sample of advanced practice nurses (n = 980, 149 responded), and all ONS members who were doctorally prepared (n = 589, 143 responded); 713 responded overall.
The 2004 survey was revised and the new 2008 survey was beta tested. The invitation to complete the survey was sent via e-mail with a link to the survey Web site. A follow-up reminder was sent one week after the initial invitation.
70 oncology nursing research topic questions, divided into five categories, and two additional categories regarding ONS Putting Evidence Into Practice resources.
Quality of life and pain were the two highest rated topics, consistent with 2000 and 2004 research priority survey findings. Eleven topics were new to the top 20 ranked priority topics in 2008. Differences in rankings were apparent between member groups.
The respondents represented the broad spectrum of ONS membership. Changes in topic rankings indicate that oncology nursing research priorities have shifted since the 2004 survey. The lag in research result dissemination to clinical practice may account for differences in topic rating between groups.
The survey results will be used to develop the 2009-2013 ONS Research Agenda. The results also will assist the ONS Foundation and other funding agencies in setting priorities.
目的/目标：确定肿瘤护理研究的优先事项，包括2008年6月肿瘤护理协会（ONS）成员所确定的循证实践资源的影响。
描述性横断面研究。
对ONS成员进行基于网络的调查。
分为三组：普通成员的代表性随机样本（n = 4460，421人回复）、高级实践护士的过度抽样随机样本（n = 980，149人回复）以及所有具有博士学位的ONS成员（n = 589，143人回复）；总体有713人回复。
对2004年的调查问卷进行修订，并对新的2008年调查问卷进行预测试。通过电子邮件发送完成调查问卷的邀请，并附上调查网站的链接。在首次邀请一周后发送跟进提醒。
70个肿瘤护理研究主题问题，分为五类，以及另外两类关于ONS将证据应用于实践的资源。
生活质量和疼痛是排名最高的两个主题，与2000年和2004年的研究优先事项调查结果一致。2008年排名前20的优先主题中有11个是新出现的。成员组之间的排名差异明显。
受访者代表了ONS成员的广泛范围。主题排名的变化表明，自2004年调查以来，肿瘤护理研究的优先事项已经发生了转变。研究结果向临床实践传播的滞后可能是导致组间主题评级差异的原因。
调查结果将用于制定2009 - 2013年ONS研究议程。这些结果还将帮助ONS基金会和其他资助机构确定优先事项。
