Department of Surgery, MLB Medical College, Jhansi, India. sinha_rga@ yahoo.co.in
HPB (Oxford). 2008;10(5):332-5. doi: 10.1080/13651820802247078.
The optimal time for managing cholelithiasis in acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is still controversial. One hundred and nineteen consecutive patients of ABP were taken up for the study after grouping them according to Glasgow modification of Ranson's criteria. Twelve patients with severe acute pancreatitis were excluded from the study. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was carried out during the same admission in 81 patients, while 26 patients opted for interval LC after six weeks. The results were analysed in terms of difficult dissection, operating time, complications and discharge time. The parameters of the patients undergoing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) were then compared with those undergoing interval LC and 90 control patients who underwent elective LC for cholelithiasis. There was no difference in the operative parameters among the three groups except that dissection was significantly more difficult in patients being operated after six weeks of the attack. Also in those being operated immediately after the attack, significantly greater number of patients required a fourth port for completion of surgery as compared to the control patients. ELC in patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis appears to be a viable and better alternative to interval cholecystectomy.
在急性胆源性胰腺炎(ABP)中处理胆石症的最佳时机仍存在争议。根据格拉斯哥改良的 Ranson 标准对 119 例连续 ABP 患者进行分组后,我们对其进行了研究。排除了 12 例重症急性胰腺炎患者。81 例患者在住院期间行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC),26 例患者选择在 6 周后行间隔期 LC。根据手术难度、手术时间、并发症和出院时间对结果进行分析。然后将早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术(ELC)患者的参数与间隔期 LC 患者和 90 例择期行 LC 治疗胆石症的对照患者进行比较。除了在发病后 6 周接受手术的患者手术难度明显增加外,三组之间的手术参数没有差异。此外,与对照组相比,在发病后立即接受手术的患者中,有更多的患者需要第四个端口才能完成手术。对于轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎患者,ELC 似乎是一种可行且更好的选择,优于间隔期胆囊切除术。