Brembilla-Perrot B, Takoordyal M, Terrier de la Chaise A, Suty-Selton C, Thiel B, Louis P, Brua J L
Service de cardiologie A, CHU Brabois, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy.
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1991 Jun;84(6):823-8.
Programmed ventricular stimulation risks inducing non-pathological ventricular fibrillo-flutter. The aim of this study was to determine if the induction of a non-sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (over 5 intraventricular reentries) could prevent this incident. One hundred and thirty-three non-sustained polymorphic tachycardias were induced by 2 or 3 extrastimuli during 1450 programmed ventricular stimulation studies. Ventricular stimulation was continued and led to ventricular fibrillo-flutter in 46 cases (Group I); to induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia in 26 cases (Group II) or to no other arrhythmias excepting the non-sustained tachycardia in 61 cases (Group III). The duration of the salvo was similar in all 3 groups. The rate of the induced arrhythmia was significantly lower in Group II (234 vs 290/min). The essential difference between the three groups was the clinical context. Only patients in Group II had previously documented sustained ventricular tachycardia and only patients in Group III had no apparent underlying cardiac disease. These results suggest that the decision to stop programmed ventricular stimulation should be based on the clinical indications of the study. In patients with previously documented or probable sustained ventricular tachycardia, it would seem to be necessary to continue ventricular stimulation irrespective to the rate and duration of the induced non-sustained ventricular tachycardia.