Suppr超能文献

职业噪声暴露的感知测量与定量测量的比较。

Comparison of perceived and quantitative measures of occupational noise exposure.

作者信息

Neitzel Richard, Daniell William, Sheppard Lianne, Davies Hugh, Seixas Noah

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Box 354695, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

Ann Occup Hyg. 2009 Jan;53(1):41-54. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men071. Epub 2008 Nov 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Characterization of highly variable noise exposures over long periods of time presents a major challenge. Common exposure assessment strategies such as assignment of exposure levels based on job title information may not provide adequate exposure contrast or precision for variable exposures. Subjective exposure data may offer an alternative or complementary exposure assessment strategy. This study evaluated the relationship between perceived and quantitatively measured exposure.

METHODS

Twenty subjects were recruited at each of three worksites with different noise environments (continuous, intermittent and highly variable). Full-shift quantitative measurements (n = 206) were made on each subject during four workshifts over 2 weeks. Perceived exposure data were collected via surveys on subjects' first (n = 58) and last (n = 57) monitored shifts, as well as through timeline logs completed by subjects during each monitored shift. The first survey focused on the first shift only, while the second survey covered the whole 2-week period.

RESULTS

Timeline log data suggested that subjects could differentiate between different noise levels and degrees of noise variability. Survey items on perceived exposure variability and impulsiveness performed well at the continuous and highly variable sites. Analyses of contrast between exposure grouping strategies showed that job title generally did not produce statistically distinct exposure groups and that several survey items provided greater contrast than job title. The precision of exposures predicted from survey items was comparable to, or slightly better than, that of job title for several survey items, and the addition of survey items to prediction models which included job title improved model fit and precision.

CONCLUSIONS

Supplemental perceived noise exposure information appears to offer promise for improving exposure estimates, particularly for individuals with highly variable exposures.

摘要

目的

长期高度可变噪声暴露的特征描述是一项重大挑战。常见的暴露评估策略,如根据职位信息分配暴露水平,可能无法为可变暴露提供足够的暴露对比度或精度。主观暴露数据可能提供一种替代或补充的暴露评估策略。本研究评估了感知暴露与定量测量暴露之间的关系。

方法

在三个具有不同噪声环境(连续、间歇和高度可变)的工作场所各招募20名受试者。在2周内的四个工作日班次中,对每个受试者进行全班次定量测量(n = 206)。通过对受试者首次(n = 58)和末次(n = 57)监测班次的调查,以及受试者在每个监测班次完成的时间线日志收集感知暴露数据。第一次调查仅关注第一个班次,而第二次调查涵盖整个2周期间。

结果

时间线日志数据表明,受试者能够区分不同的噪声水平和噪声可变程度。关于感知暴露变异性和冲动性的调查项目在连续和高度可变场所表现良好。暴露分组策略之间的对比分析表明,职位通常不会产生统计学上不同的暴露组,并且几个调查项目提供了比职位更大的对比度。对于几个调查项目,从调查项目预测的暴露精度与职位相当,或略优于职位,并且将调查项目添加到包括职位的预测模型中可改善模型拟合和精度。

结论

补充的感知噪声暴露信息似乎有望改善暴露估计,特别是对于暴露高度可变的个体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验