Jelic Vesna, Haglund Anders, Kowalski Jan, Langworth Sven, Winblad Bengt
Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of NVS, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital-Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;26(5):458-66. doi: 10.1159/000167267. Epub 2008 Nov 4.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our objective was to define clinically meaningful outcomes in donepezil versus placebo treatment in severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to describe characteristics of responders.
Analyses were performed on data from a 6-month, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study on the efficacy of donepezil in 248 nursing home residents. Various individual responses were defined as stabilisation or improvement on the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-activities of daily living scale (ADCS-ADL), Mini-Mental State Examination, Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) or Clinical Global Impression of Improvement. Three composite measures were defined by combining the individual response criteria on these outcomes. The impact of baseline disease severity and of concomitant use of psychotropic drugs was also analysed.
At 6 months, greater proportions of patients defined as responders to donepezil on individual efficacy measures showed significant stabilisation or improvement compared with placebo on the SIB (>or=0, >or=4 or >or=7 points) and Mini-Mental State Examination (>or=0 or >or=3 points), and positive trends on the ADCS-ADL-severe (>or=3 points) and the NPI cluster based on mood items. All 3 composite measures of efficacy showed a significantly higher proportion of responders in the donepezil group. The responders had a similar distribution between the 2 subgroups of cognitive and functional disease severity at baseline. The donepezil-treated patients taking psychotropic drugs showed significantly greater improvement on the SIB, less deterioration on the ADCS-ADL, and had higher Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scores and a trend towards lower NPI scores. The baseline demographic and clinical profile did not differ between the non-responders and responders on the composite outcome measures.
The results demonstrate that donepezil treatment of patients with severe AD consistently shows stabilisation or improvement across multiple outcome measures in individual patients, including cognitive, functional and behavioural symptoms.
背景/目的:我们的目标是确定多奈哌齐与安慰剂治疗重度阿尔茨海默病(AD)时具有临床意义的疗效指标,并描述有反应者的特征。
对一项为期6个月的双盲、平行组、安慰剂对照研究的数据进行分析,该研究纳入了248名养老院居民,评估多奈哌齐的疗效。各种个体反应被定义为在严重损害量表(SIB)、阿尔茨海默病协作研究日常生活活动量表(ADCS-ADL)、简易精神状态检查表、神经精神科问卷(NPI)或临床总体改善印象量表上达到稳定或改善。通过合并这些指标的个体反应标准定义了三个综合指标。还分析了基线疾病严重程度和同时使用精神药物的影响。
在6个月时,在个体疗效指标上被定义为对多奈哌齐有反应的患者中,与安慰剂相比,在SIB(≥0、≥4或≥7分)和简易精神状态检查表(≥0或≥3分)上有更大比例的患者显示出显著的稳定或改善,在ADCS-ADL重度(≥3分)和基于情绪项目的NPI聚类上有积极趋势。所有三个疗效综合指标均显示多奈哌齐组有反应者的比例显著更高。在基线时,认知和功能疾病严重程度的两个亚组中,有反应者的分布相似。服用精神药物的多奈哌齐治疗患者在SIB上改善更显著,在ADCS-ADL上恶化程度更低,临床总体改善印象评分更高,NPI评分有降低趋势。在综合疗效指标上,无反应者和有反应者的基线人口统计学和临床特征无差异。
结果表明,多奈哌齐治疗重度AD患者在多个疗效指标上,包括认知、功能和行为症状,持续显示出个体患者的病情稳定或改善。