Smith Megan, Higgs Joy, Ellis Elizabeth
School of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, Albury, Australia.
Physiother Res Int. 2008 Dec;13(4):209-22. doi: 10.1002/pri.419.
Physiotherapists have been increasingly interested in investigating physiotherapy clinical reasoning and decision-making processes. Cardiorespiratory physiotherapy has received little attention within this increasing body of research. This study aimed to investigate characteristics and processes of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy decision making and to contribute to the broader understanding of physiotherapy reasoning and decision making.
Fourteen cardiorespiratory physiotherapists took part in the study. Qualitative research methods were used, guided by a philosophical hermeneutic approach. Participants were observed undertaking their usual daily patient care activities and were later interviewed about their decision making. In-depth, iterative hermeneutic strategies were used to interpret the texts created by these processes to identify the nature and processes of decision making.
Clinical decision making in cardiorespiratory physiotherapy is focused on making decisions about the nature of patients' problems, physiotherapeutic intervention and interaction, and evaluation of effectiveness of actions. Cardiorespiratory physiotherapy decisions varied in their difficulty according to the attributes of the decisions. The variable nature of decisions influenced the reasoning processes used. Clinical decision making involved complex reasoning processes that were cyclic, evolving and flexible in nature, with interdependence and interrelation between the different foci of clinical decision making. Clinical decision making was also found to be a social and collaborative process.
This study contributes to the body of literature on physiotherapy reasoning and decision making by revealing details about the characteristics and processes of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy decision making. This research can be used to shape the education of beginning practitioners and provide practicing physiotherapists with a basis for critical appraisal of their decision making.
物理治疗师对研究物理治疗临床推理及决策过程的兴趣日益浓厚。在这一不断增加的研究领域中,心肺物理治疗受到的关注较少。本研究旨在调查心肺物理治疗决策的特点及过程,以促进对物理治疗推理及决策的更广泛理解。
14名心肺物理治疗师参与了本研究。采用质性研究方法,以哲学诠释学方法为指导。观察参与者进行日常患者护理活动,随后就其决策进行访谈。运用深入、迭代的诠释学策略解读这些过程产生的文本,以确定决策的性质及过程。
心肺物理治疗中的临床决策聚焦于对患者问题的性质、物理治疗干预及互动以及行动效果评估做出决策。心肺物理治疗决策的难度因其属性而异。决策的可变性质影响了所采用的推理过程。临床决策涉及复杂的推理过程,这些过程本质上是循环的、不断发展的且灵活的,临床决策的不同重点之间相互依存且相互关联。临床决策还被发现是一个社会协作过程。
本研究通过揭示心肺物理治疗决策的特点及过程细节,为物理治疗推理及决策的文献做出了贡献。这项研究可用于指导初入行从业者的教育,并为执业物理治疗师对其决策进行批判性评估提供依据。