Biomedical Imaging Resource, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Dec;68(3):409-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.017. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
Dual-energy CT scanning has significant potential for disease identification and classification. However, it dramatically increases the amount of data collected and therefore impacts the clinical workflow. One way to simplify image review is to fuse CT datasets of different tube energies into a unique blended dataset with desirable properties. A non-linear blending method based on a modified sigmoid function was compared to a standard 0.3 linear blending method. The methods were evaluated in both a liver phantom and patient study. The liver phantom contained six syringes of known CT contrast which were placed in a bovine liver. After scanning at multiple tube currents (45, 55, 65, 75, 85, 95, 105, and 115 mAs for the 140-kV tube), the datasets were blended using both methods. A contrast-to-noise (CNR) measure was calculated for each syringe. In addition, all eight scans were normalized using the effective dose and statistically compared. In the patient study, 45 dual-energy CT scans were retrospectively mixed using the 0.3 linear blending and modified sigmoid blending functions. The scans were compared visually by two radiologists. For the 15, 45, and 64 HU syringes, the non-linear blended images exhibited similar CNR to the linear blended images; however, for the 79, 116, and 145 HU syringes, the non-linear blended images consistently had a higher CNR across dose settings. The radiologists qualitatively preferred the non-linear blended images of the phantom. In the patient study, the radiologists preferred non-linear blending in 31 of 45 cases with a strong preference in bowel and liver cases. Non-linear blending of dual energy data can provide an improvement in CNR over linear blending and is accompanied by a visual preference for non-linear blended images. Further study on selection of blending parameters and lesion conspicuity in non-linear blended images is being pursued.
双能 CT 扫描在疾病识别和分类方面具有重要的潜力。然而,它显著增加了所收集的数据量,因此影响了临床工作流程。一种简化图像审查的方法是将不同管能的 CT 数据集融合到具有理想特性的独特混合数据集中。本文比较了一种基于修正型 sigmoid 函数的非线性混合方法和一种标准的 0.3 线性混合方法。这两种方法在肝脏体模和患者研究中都进行了评估。肝脏体模中包含六个已知 CT 对比剂的注射器,它们被放置在牛的肝脏中。在多个管电流(140kV 管的 45、55、65、75、85、95、105 和 115 mAs)下扫描后,使用这两种方法对数据集进行混合。为每个注射器计算了对比噪声比(CNR)。此外,还对所有 8 个扫描进行了归一化,并进行了统计学比较。在患者研究中,使用 0.3 线性混合和修正型 sigmoid 混合函数对 45 次双能 CT 扫描进行了回顾性混合。由两位放射科医生对扫描进行了视觉比较。对于 15、45 和 64 HU 注射器,非线性混合图像的 CNR 与线性混合图像相似;然而,对于 79、116 和 145 HU 注射器,在不同剂量设置下,非线性混合图像的 CNR 始终更高。放射科医生在体模中更喜欢非线性混合图像。在患者研究中,放射科医生在 45 个病例中有 31 个更喜欢非线性混合,在肠和肝病例中更喜欢强烈。与线性混合相比,双能数据的非线性混合可以提高 CNR,并伴有对非线性混合图像的视觉偏好。目前正在进一步研究非线性混合图像中混合参数的选择和病变的显著程度。