Suppr超能文献

对神经肌肉阻滞剂的过敏反应。

Hypersensitivity reactions to neuromuscular blocking agents.

作者信息

Mertes P M, Aimone-Gastin I, Guéant-Rodriguez R M, Mouton-Faivre C, Audibert G, O'Brien J, Frendt D, Brezeanu M, Bouaziz H, Guéant J L

机构信息

Département d'Anesthésie-réanimation, CHU de Nancy, Hôpital Central, 29 Avenue de Lattre de Tassigny, 54035 Nancy Cedex, France.

出版信息

Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14(27):2809-25. doi: 10.2174/138161208786369704.

Abstract

Neuromuscular blocking agents are the leading drugs responsible for immediate hypersensitivity reactions during anaesthesia. Most hypersensitivity reactions represent IgE-mediated allergic reactions. Their incidence is estimated to be between 1 in 3,000 to 1 in 110,000 general anaesthetics. However striking variations have been reported among countries. The mechanism of sensitisation seems to implicate the presence of a substituted ammonium ion in the molecule. Due to lack of exposure prior to the reaction in a large number of reactors, it has been hypothesised that sensitisation may involve other, as yet undefined, substituted (quaternary and tertiary) ammonium ion containing compounds such as pholcodine, present in the environment of the patient. This hypothesis is still under investigation. The mechanism of non-IgE mediated hypersensitivity reactions is less well known. Identified mechanisms correspond to direct histamine release or interactions with muscarinic and nicotinic receptors. Allergic reactions cannot be clinically distinguished from non-IgE-mediated reactions. Therefore, any suspected hypersensitivity reaction must be investigated using combined pre and postoperative testing. Because of the frequent but not systematic cross-reactivity observed with muscle relaxants, every available neuromuscular blocking agent should be tested, using intradermal tests to confirm the responsibility of the suspected drug which should be definitely excluded. Cross-sensitivity investigation will also try to identify the safety of drugs that can be potentially used in future anaesthesia. The determination of basophil activation investigations using direct leukocyte histamine release test or flow cytometry would be of particular interest to investigate cross sensitisation in complement to skin tests. There is no demonstrated evidence supporting systematic pre-operative screening in the general population at this time. However, since no specific treatment has been shown to reliably prevent anaphylaxis, allergy assessment must be performed in all high-risk patients. In view of the relative complexity of allergy investigation, and of the differences between countries, an active policy to identify patients at risk and to provide any necessary support from expert advice to anaesthetists and allergologists through the constitution of allergo-anaesthesia centres in every country should be promoted.

摘要

神经肌肉阻滞剂是麻醉期间引起速发型超敏反应的主要药物。大多数超敏反应是IgE介导的过敏反应。据估计,其发生率在每3000至110000例全身麻醉中出现1例。然而,各国报道的发生率存在显著差异。致敏机制似乎与分子中存在取代铵离子有关。由于大量反应者在反应前未接触过该药物,因此有人推测致敏可能涉及患者环境中存在的其他尚未明确的含取代(季铵和叔铵)铵离子的化合物,如福尔可定。这一假设仍在研究中。非IgE介导的超敏反应机制尚不太清楚。已确定的机制包括直接组胺释放或与毒蕈碱和烟碱受体的相互作用。过敏反应在临床上无法与非IgE介导的反应区分开来。因此,任何疑似超敏反应都必须通过术前和术后联合检测进行调查。由于观察到肌肉松弛剂之间频繁但不系统的交叉反应,应使用皮内试验对每一种可用的神经肌肉阻滞剂进行检测,以确认疑似药物的责任,该药物应被明确排除。交叉敏感性研究还将试图确定未来麻醉中可能使用的药物的安全性。使用直接白细胞组胺释放试验或流式细胞术进行嗜碱性粒细胞活化研究,对于补充皮肤试验来研究交叉致敏将特别有意义。目前没有证据支持对普通人群进行系统的术前筛查。然而,由于尚未证明有任何特异性治疗方法能可靠地预防过敏反应,因此必须对所有高危患者进行过敏评估。鉴于过敏调查相对复杂,且各国情况不同,应推行一项积极政策,通过在每个国家设立过敏麻醉中心,识别高危患者,并为麻醉师和过敏症专科医生提供从专家建议到任何必要支持的服务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验