Bonadio Federica, Margot Pierre, Delémont Olivier, Esseiva Pierre
Ecole des Sciences Criminelles, Institut de Police Scientifique, University of Lausanne, Batochime, CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny, Switzerland.
Forensic Sci Int. 2008 Nov 20;182(1-3):52-6. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) is assessed as an alternative to liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) currently used for 3,4-methylenedioxymethampethamine (MDMA) profiling. Both methods were compared evaluating their performance in discriminating and classifying samples. For this purpose 62 different seizures were analysed using both extraction techniques followed by gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS). A previously validated method provided data for HS-SPME, whereas LLE data were collected applying a harmonized methodology developed and used in the European project CHAMP. After suitable pre-treatment, similarities between sample pairs were studied using the Pearson correlation. Both methods enable to distinguish between samples coming from the same pre-tabletting batches and samples coming from different pre-tabletting batches. This finding emphasizes the use of HS-SPME as an effective alternative to LLE, with additional advantages such as sample preparation and a solvent-free process.
顶空固相微萃取(HS-SPME)被评估为目前用于3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺(摇头丸)分析的液液萃取(LLE)的替代方法。对这两种方法进行了比较,评估了它们在鉴别和分类样品方面的性能。为此,使用这两种萃取技术,然后进行气相色谱-质谱联用(GC-MS),分析了62个不同的缉获样品。一种先前经过验证的方法提供了HS-SPME的数据,而LLE数据是采用欧洲项目CHAMP开发并使用的统一方法收集的。经过适当的预处理后,使用皮尔逊相关性研究样品对之间的相似性。两种方法都能够区分来自同一压片前批次的样品和来自不同压片前批次的样品。这一发现强调了HS-SPME作为LLE的有效替代方法的应用,它还具有诸如样品制备和无溶剂过程等额外优势。