Gall Carolin, Mueller Iris, Gudlin Julia, Lindig Anja, Schlueter Dorothee, Jobke Sandra, Franke Gabriele H, Sabel Bernhard A
Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Medical Faculty, Institute of Medical Psychology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2008;26(4-5):341-53.
The aim of the study was to examine if improvements of stimulus detection performance in visual field tests after intensive visual training of the visual field border zone in patients with visual field defects are associated with changes in self-reported vision- and health-related quality of life (QoL).
We studied a clinical sample of 85 patients suffering from visual field loss after brain damage that underwent repetitive, daily light stimulation (vision restoration training, VRT) of the visual field border and the blind visual field for up to 75 hrs (N=16) or 150 hrs (N=69). Stimulus detection was quantified in the central visual field with a campimetric method before and after intervention. Health-related QoL was assessed by the Health-Survey SF-36 and vision-related QoL by the 39-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ).
Both vision- and health-related QoL measures improved after VRT. Significant increases were found in 8 out of 12 NEI-VFQ and 3 out of 8 SF-36 subscales. Of the 85 participants 6% showed a decrease in stimulus detection performance, 42% showed an increase of less than 5% detected stimuli, 24% showed an increase of 5-10% detected stimuli and 28% of more than 10% detected stimuli. Changes in campimetric stimulus detection rates were related to NEI-VFQ subscales point differences general vision (3 points), difficulty with near vision activities (4 points), limitations in social functioning due to vision (4 points) and driving problems (12 points). There was no relation of visual field changes to changes in SF-36 component and subscale scores.
The NEI-VFQ is a valuable measure of self-reported visual impairment in patients with visual field defects. Stimulation of the visual field by training may lead to improvements of vision-related QoL which were correlated with the extent of visual field enlargements.
本研究旨在探讨视野缺损患者对视野边缘区进行强化视觉训练后,视野测试中刺激检测性能的改善是否与自我报告的视力及健康相关生活质量(QoL)的变化有关。
我们研究了85例脑损伤后视野缺损患者的临床样本,这些患者对视野边缘和盲视野进行了重复的每日光刺激(视力恢复训练,VRT),时长可达75小时(N = 16)或150小时(N = 69)。干预前后,采用平面视野计法对中央视野的刺激检测进行量化。通过健康调查简表SF - 36评估健康相关生活质量,通过39项美国国立眼科研究所视觉功能问卷(NEI - VFQ)评估视力相关生活质量。
VRT后,视力及健康相关生活质量指标均有所改善。在12项NEI - VFQ子量表中有8项、8项SF - 36子量表中有3项出现显著增加。85名参与者中,6%的人刺激检测性能下降,42%的人检测到的刺激增加不到5%,24%的人检测到的刺激增加5 - 10%,28%的人检测到的刺激增加超过10%。平面视野计刺激检测率的变化与NEI - VFQ子量表得分差异相关,包括总体视力(3分)、近视力活动困难(4分)、因视力导致的社会功能受限(4分)和驾驶问题(12分)。视野变化与SF - 36分量表及子量表得分变化无关。
NEI - VFQ是评估视野缺损患者自我报告视力损害的重要指标。通过训练刺激视野可能会改善视力相关生活质量,且与视野扩大程度相关。