Tol S, de Haan G A, Postuma E M J L, Jansen J L, Heutink J
Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Royal Dutch Visio, Centre of Expertise for Blind and Partially Sighted People, Amersfoortsestraatweg 180, 1272 RR, Huizen, The Netherlands.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Jun;35(2):254-300. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09636-4. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
Reading difficulties are amongst the most commonly reported problems in individuals with homonymous visual field defects (HVFDs). To be able to provide guidance for healthcare professionals considering offering reading training, researchers in this field and interested individuals with HVFDs, this systematic review aims to (1) provide an overview of the contextual and intervention characteristics of all published HVFD interventions and (2) generate insights into the different reading outcome measures that these studies adopted. A search on PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Web of Science was conducted up to February 2, 2023. All intervention studies for HVFD in which reading was measured were included. Data was collected about the intervention type, session duration, number of sessions, the intensity, duration, circumstance of the interventions, country in which the intervention was studied and reading measures. Sixty records are included, describing 70 interventions in total of which 21 are specifically reading interventions. Overall, adjusted saccadic behaviour interventions occur most in the literature. A wide range within all intervention characteristics was observed. Forty-nine records reported task-performance reading measures, and 33 records reported self-reported reading measures. The majority of task-performance measures are based on self-developed paragraph reading tasks with a time-based outcome measure (e.g. words per minute). Future research could benefit from making use of validated reading tests, approaching the measurement of reading mixed-methods and providing participants the possibility to supply outcomes relevant to them.
阅读困难是同向性视野缺损（HVFD）患者中最常被报告的问题之一。为了能够为考虑提供阅读训练的医疗保健专业人员、该领域的研究人员以及患有HVFD的相关人士提供指导，本系统综述旨在：（1）概述所有已发表的HVFD干预措施的背景和干预特征；（2）深入了解这些研究所采用的不同阅读结果测量方法。截至2023年2月2日，我们在PsycINFO、MEDLINE和科学网进行了检索。纳入了所有测量阅读情况的HVFD干预研究。收集了有关干预类型、每次训练时长、训练次数、强度、干预持续时间、干预环境、研究干预措施的国家以及阅读测量方法的数据。共纳入60条记录，描述了总共70项干预措施，其中21项是专门的阅读干预措施。总体而言，调整性扫视行为干预措施在文献中出现得最多。观察到所有干预特征的范围都很广。49条记录报告了任务表现阅读测量方法，33条记录报告了自我报告阅读测量方法。大多数任务表现测量方法基于自行设计的段落阅读任务，并采用基于时间的结果测量方法（例如每分钟字数）。未来的研究可以从使用经过验证的阅读测试、采用混合方法测量阅读以及为参与者提供提供与他们相关结果的可能性中受益。
