Tol Sarah, Timmerman Marieke E, Goltermann Alina, Heutink Joost, de Haan Gera A
Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychometrics and Statistics, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;12(15):1527. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12151527.
The ability to read is important for daily life functioning. Individuals with homonymous visual field defects (iwHs) after brain injury experience frequent reading difficulties. The current study presents a novel self-report questionnaire aimed at measuring the wide variety of reading difficulties iwHs can experience: the Hemianopia Reading Questionnaire (HRQ). The 24-item HRQ was developed with help from clinical experts and experts by experience and was inspired by existing reading questionnaires for adults. The three tested subscales of the HRQ assess the relationship to reading, reading skills and daily life functional reading. The factor structure, reliability, convergent validity and divergent validity were examined in a large community sample (i.e., individuals without homonymous visual field defects) with a comparable distribution of age, gender and level of education to those who have suffered a stroke (N = 998). Two competing hypothesized models were tested and a good fit was found for a three-bifactor model of the HRQ. The reliability of the three subscales was found to be good (ω range 0.93-0.99), as well as the convergent and divergent validity (9 out of 12 Spearman's correlations, according to expectations). The results support further use of the HRQ in iwHs, especially in the context of reading rehabilitation. Suggestions for clinical and scientific use and future psychometric research on the HRQ are provided.
阅读能力对于日常生活功能十分重要。脑损伤后患有同侧视野缺损(iwHs)的个体经常会遇到阅读困难。当前研究提出了一种新颖的自我报告问卷,旨在测量iwHs可能经历的各种各样的阅读困难:偏盲阅读问卷(HRQ)。这份包含24个条目的HRQ是在临床专家和有经验的专家的帮助下编制而成,其灵感来源于现有的成人阅读问卷。HRQ经过测试的三个分量表评估与阅读的关系、阅读技能以及日常生活功能性阅读。在一个年龄、性别和教育水平分布与中风患者可比的大型社区样本(即没有同侧视野缺损的个体,N = 998)中检验了该问卷的因子结构、信度、收敛效度和区分效度。对两个相互竞争的假设模型进行了测试,发现HRQ的三双因子模型拟合良好。发现三个分量表的信度良好(ω范围为0.93 - 0.99),收敛效度和区分效度也良好(12个斯皮尔曼相关性中有9个符合预期)。结果支持在iwHs中进一步使用HRQ,尤其是在阅读康复的背景下。还提供了关于HRQ临床和科学应用以及未来心理测量学研究的建议。