Pūriene Alina, Petrauskiene Jadvyga, Balciūniene Irena, Janulyte Vilija, Kutkauskiene Jelena, Musteikyte Margarita
Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Odontology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2008;44(10):805-11.
To compare demographic and social groups of patients, their satisfaction with services in public and private dental institutions.
A random sample of 3000 Lithuanian residents was selected; 1801 participants answered a postal questionnaire. The response rate was 60.0%. Univariate analysis, chi(2) criterion, z-test, and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between institution type, demographic and social characteristics of the respondents. RESULTS. Less than half of Lithuanian residents (41.2%) visited public dental institutions, 35.9%--private, 25.9%--both. They preferred private dental sector due to better quality of service, public--due to closeness to residence or being the treatment place of acquaintances. Patients visiting public institutions required cheaper treatment, while patients visiting private institutions--qualitative, though more expensive, using modern technologies. The number of dental visits in the past year was lower in public institutions than in private ones. The majority of patients treated in public, private, and both institutions were satisfied with dental services. The least satisfied were visiting both institutions. More respondents with secondary and lower education used public services as compared to those with higher education. Urban population visited public institutions more often than rural population. Respondents with a monthly income of less than 500 Lt for one family member used public dental services more often than those receiving a higher income. Older patients visited public dental institutions more often than younger ones. CONCLUSIONS. More Lithuanian residents are treated in public dental institutions (up to 67.1%) than in private. Older, receiving lower income patients preferred public institutions. The majority of patients in public clinics as well as in private sector are satisfied with the service. Those who visited both types of institutions were least satisfied with dental services.
摘要 目的:比较患者的人口统计学和社会群体,以及他们对公立和私立牙科机构服务的满意度。
选取3000名立陶宛居民的随机样本;1801名参与者回复了邮政问卷。回复率为60.0%。采用单因素分析、卡方检验、z检验和多元逻辑回归来评估机构类型与受访者的人口统计学和社会特征之间的关联。结果。不到一半的立陶宛居民(41.2%)去过公立牙科机构,35.9%去过私立机构,25.9%两者都去过。他们因服务质量更好而更喜欢私立牙科部门,因距离住所近或熟人在此治疗而更喜欢公立部门。去公立机构就诊的患者要求治疗费用更低,而去私立机构就诊的患者则要求质量更好,尽管费用更高且使用现代技术。过去一年在公立机构的看牙次数低于私立机构。在公立、私立和两者都去过的机构接受治疗的大多数患者对牙科服务感到满意。最不满意的是去过两种机构的患者。与受过高等教育的受访者相比,受教育程度为中学及以下的受访者更多地使用公共服务。城市人口比农村人口更频繁地访问公立机构。一个家庭成员月收入低于500立特的受访者比收入较高的受访者更频繁地使用公共牙科服务。老年患者比年轻患者更频繁地访问公立牙科机构。结论。在公立牙科机构接受治疗的立陶宛居民(高达67.1%)比私立机构更多。收入较低的老年患者更喜欢公立机构。公立诊所和私立部门的大多数患者对服务感到满意。去过两种机构的患者对牙科服务最不满意。