Sheiban Imad, Garrone Paolo, Sillano Dario, Biondi-Zoccai Giuseppe, Sciuto Filippo, Omedè Pierluigi, Lombardi Primiano, Meliga Emanuele, Anselmino Matteo, Trevi Gian Paolo, Moretti Claudio
Interventional Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008 Dec;9(12):1246-53. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32830d8303.
We aimed to appraise the outcomes of diabetic patients with unprotected left main (ULM) disease treated with drug-eluting stents. Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation is increasingly used for ULM disease. However, there are no data on the clinical results of drug-eluting stents for ULM disease in patients with diabetes.
We collected baseline and outcome data from all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for ULM disease at our institution since 2002. We identified three groups: insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus patients, noninsulin-requiring diabetes mellitus patients, and nondiabetes mellitus individuals. The primary end point was the rate of major adverse cardiac events, that is, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. We also appraised stent thrombosis according to the Academic Research Consortium.
A total of 185 patients were enrolled, 25/185 (14%) insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus patients, 30/185 (16%) noninsulin-requiring diabetes mellitus patients, and 130/185 (70%) nondiabetes mellitus individuals. In-hospital adverse events were overall uncommon and not significantly different across groups. After a median follow-up period of 23.1 months, major adverse cardiac events had occurred in similar rates across groups: 6/25 (24%) insulin-requiring patients with diabetes mellitus, 8/30 (27%) noninsulin-requiring patients with diabetes mellitus, and 31/128 (24%) nondiabetes mellitus individuals (P = 0.96). No case of definite or probable stent thrombosis was adjudicated. Intriguingly, possible stent thrombosis was nonsignificantly more common among insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus patients than among noninsulin-requiring diabetes mellitus patients or nondiabetes mellitus individuals [1/25 (4%) vs. 0/30 (0%) and 1/128 (0.8%), respectively, P = 0.30].
Drug-eluting stents provide favorable early and long-term results in both selected patients with diabetes and nondiabetic individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ULM disease. Nonetheless, further randomized data are eagerly awaited to definitely confirm or disprove these findings.
我们旨在评估接受药物洗脱支架治疗的无保护左主干(ULM)疾病糖尿病患者的治疗结果。药物洗脱支架植入的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗越来越多地用于ULM疾病。然而,尚无关于糖尿病患者ULM疾病药物洗脱支架临床结果的数据。
我们收集了自2002年以来在我院接受药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的所有ULM疾病患者的基线和结果数据。我们确定了三组:需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者、不需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者和非糖尿病个体。主要终点是主要不良心脏事件发生率,即心源性死亡、心肌梗死或靶血管血运重建。我们还根据学术研究联盟评估了支架血栓形成情况。
共纳入185例患者,其中25/185(14%)为需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者,30/185(16%)为不需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者,130/185(70%)为非糖尿病个体。住院不良事件总体不常见,且各组之间无显著差异。中位随访期为23.1个月后,各组主要不良心脏事件发生率相似:25例需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者中有6例(24%),30例不需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者中有8例(27%),128例非糖尿病个体中有31例(24%)(P = 0.96)。未判定有明确或可能的支架血栓形成病例。有趣的是,需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者中可能的支架血栓形成比不需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者或非糖尿病个体更常见,但差异无统计学意义[分别为1/25(4%)、0/30(0%)和1/128(0.8%),P = 0.30]。
药物洗脱支架在接受ULM疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的部分糖尿病患者和非糖尿病个体中均能提供良好的早期和长期结果。尽管如此,仍迫切需要进一步的随机数据来明确证实或反驳这些发现。