Figueras-Aloy J, Berrueco R, Salvia-Roiges M D, Rodríguez-Miguélez J M, Miracle-Echegoyen X, Botet-Mussons F, Mur-Sierra A, Vall O, Carbonell-Estrany X
Hospital Clínic, Institut Clínic de Ginecologia, Obstetrícia i Neonatologia, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2008 Dec;43(12):1167-74. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20893.
Simulated exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) depends on ventilatory settings used in different experimental conditions.
To normalize the simulated minute exhaled nitric oxide according to different ventilatory settings.
Different ventilatory settings influence the concentrations of exhaled nitric oxide and these results can be normalized. METHODOLOGY AND STUDY DESIGN: We used a rubber lung model (50 ml) with an orifice through which a 3 mm endotracheal tube was introduced. The NO, which simulated that of endogenous production, was delivered through the base of the lung using a unidirectional rotameter and obtaining a concentration of around 25 ppb. The sample of gas was recorded through a 6 F arterial catheter introduced into the endotracheal tube to its tip. The ventilator used was a Babylog 8000. Air delivered was compressed and filtered and had an NO content of under 0.3 ppb. The NO level assessed was the plateau value given by the software of the Sievers NOA apparatus. Each experiment involved sampling during 1 min, three times. Normalization was done using a multiple cubic regression formula.
An increase in respiratory frequency or in peak of inspiratory pressure were accompanied by a decrease in eNO (ppb). Minute volume was adjusted for the percentage of leakage given by the ventilator. Normalization was obtained analyzing 518 respirations with different ventilatory settings. The coefficient of variation fell from 15.5% to 0.27%. Validation of the normalization formula was performed in other three groups (320, 372, and 372 respirations) with different simulated NO concentrations (25, 16, and 50 ppb), resulting in reduction of the coefficient of variation from 42.7% to 9.3%, from 42.3% to 10.6% and from 45.2% to 9.6%, respectively.
Normalization of simulated minute eNO according to ventilatory settings is possible using the equipment and experimental set-up reported. Extrapolation to patients is not possible without constraints.
模拟呼出一氧化氮(eNO)取决于不同实验条件下所使用的通气设置。
根据不同通气设置对模拟每分钟呼出一氧化氮进行标准化。
不同通气设置会影响呼出一氧化氮的浓度,且这些结果可以标准化。方法与研究设计:我们使用了一个50毫升的橡胶肺模型,带有一个孔口,通过该孔口插入一根3毫米的气管导管。模拟内源性产生的一氧化氮通过单向转子流量计从肺底部输送,浓度约为25 ppb。气体样本通过插入气管导管至其尖端的一根6F动脉导管进行记录。所使用的呼吸机是Babylog 8000。输送的空气经过压缩和过滤,一氧化氮含量低于0.3 ppb。评估的一氧化氮水平是Sievers NOA仪器软件给出的平台值。每个实验包括在1分钟内进行三次采样。使用多元三次回归公式进行标准化。
呼吸频率或吸气峰压增加时,eNO(ppb)会降低。根据呼吸机给出的漏气百分比对分钟通气量进行了调整。通过分析518次不同通气设置的呼吸获得了标准化。变异系数从15.5%降至0.27%。在其他三组(分别为320、372和372次呼吸)中,使用不同模拟一氧化氮浓度(25、16和50 ppb)对标准化公式进行了验证,变异系数分别从42.7%降至9.3%、从42.3%降至10.6%以及从45.2%降至9.6%。
使用所报告的设备和实验设置,根据通气设置对模拟每分钟eNO进行标准化是可行的。若无限制条件,无法外推至患者。