Hachem R Y, Kontoyiannis D P, Chemaly R F, Jiang Y, Reitzel R, Raad I
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, Unit 402, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jan;47(1):129-33. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00506-08. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
Previous studies have reported that galactomannan (GM) enzyme immunoassay and 1,3 beta-glucan (BG) assay may be useful diagnostic tools, but their sensitivities are variable. We compared the performances of both tests. Between October 2002 and May 2005, 82 patients were prospectively monitored for 12 weeks. A total of 414 samples were tested by GM assay and 409 samples were tested by BG assay for the following four groups of patients: those with invasive aspergillosis (IA), those with other mold infections (Fusarium, scedosporium, zygomycosis, etc.), those with candidemia, and control patients. Blood samples were obtained twice on week 1 and once every other week for a total of 12 weeks. Patients in the invasive fungal infection groups had comparable risk factors. The sensitivity of the GM test was significantly higher for patients with IA due to non-fumigatus Aspergillus species than for patients with IA due to Aspergillus fumigatus (49% versus 13%; P < 0.0001) or with other mold infections (49% versus 6%; P < 0.0001). However, the sensitivity range (47% to 64%) and specificity (88%) of the BG assay were comparable among all patients tested, regardless of the infecting pathogen. The performance of GM-based diagnosis appears to be better for detecting non-fumigatus Aspergillus species. The diagnostic marker BG was shown to have a higher sensitivity than that of GM in detecting IA and other mold infections in hematologic malignancy patients.
既往研究报道,半乳甘露聚糖(GM)酶免疫测定和1,3-β-葡聚糖(BG)测定可能是有用的诊断工具,但它们的敏感性存在差异。我们比较了这两种检测方法的性能。在2002年10月至2005年5月期间,对82例患者进行了为期12周的前瞻性监测。对以下四组患者共414份样本进行了GM测定,409份样本进行了BG测定:侵袭性曲霉病(IA)患者、其他霉菌感染(镰刀菌、赛多孢子菌、接合菌病等)患者、念珠菌血症患者及对照患者。在第1周采集血样2次,之后每隔一周采集1次,共采集12周。侵袭性真菌感染组患者具有相似的危险因素。GM检测对于非烟曲霉属所致IA患者的敏感性显著高于烟曲霉所致IA患者(49%对13%;P<0.0001)或其他霉菌感染患者(49%对6%;P<0.0001)。然而,BG测定的敏感性范围(47%至64%)和特异性(88%)在所有检测患者中相当,无论感染的病原体是什么。基于GM的诊断在检测非烟曲霉属方面表现似乎更好。诊断标志物BG在检测血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的IA和其他霉菌感染方面显示出比GM更高的敏感性。